Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 24;18(2):26–36. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12037

Table 3.

OARs geometric center difference between AIP and FB and MidV CT imaging

OARs Conditions 3D vector difference (mm) P
Average Min. Max.
Lungs‐ITV Small PTV AIP vs FB −0.04 −0.61 0.18 0.799
AIP vs MIP 0.03 −0.07 0.18 0.445
Large PTV AIP vs FB −0.05 −0.78 0.52 0.658
AIP vs MIP 0.06 −0.34 0.57 0.084
Trachea Small PTV AIP vs FB 0.02 −0.15 0.22 0.721
AIP vs MIP −0.01 −0.13 0.20 0.799
Large PTV AIP vs FB 0.02 −0.22 0.28 0.601
AIP vs MIP −0.03 −0.22 0.17 0.133
Heart Small PTV AIP vs FB 0.02 −0.19 0.25 0.799
AIP vs MIP 0.01 −0.17 0.18 0.799
Large PTV AIP vs FB −0.06 −0.27 0.23 0.078
AIP vs MIP −0.02 −0.40 0.31 0.546
Esophagus Small PTV AIP vs FB 0.00 −0.71 0.34 0.441
AIP vs MIP 0.01 −0.28 0.21 0.735
Large PTV AIP vs FB −0.09 −0.54 0.39 0.171
AIP vs MIP −0.02 −0.44 0.37 0.520
Spinal cord Small PTV AIP vs FB −0.01 −0.21 0.13 0.799
AIP vs MIP 0.02 −0.05 0.10 0.575
Large PTV AIP vs FB −0.06 −0.49 0.17 0.227
AIP vs MIP −0.01 −0.28 0.24 0.809

OARs, organs at risk; AIP, average intensity projection; FB, free breathing; MidV, mid‐ventilation.