Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 8;16(5):131–141. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i5.5587

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Bar graphs with associated SD error bars comparing the average (total 10 patients) maximum dose and dose to 100% of hippocampus (D100%) delivered using conventional NC‐WBRT vs. hippocampal‐sparing IMAT planning. IMAT treatment planning technique significantly reduced the both maximum dose (mean value <15.5±0.4 Gy) and D100% to hippocampus (mean value <8.3±0.3 Gy), in accordance with RTOG 0933 requirement.