Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 8;17(1):49–61. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i1.5527

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Alignment reproducibility of the laser positions for (a) the proposed method and conventional methods using (b) high‐ and (c) low‐accuracy levels: (a) m=32.3,σ=0.93, (b) m=33.4,σ=1.49, and (c) m=35.9,σ=2.76, where m and σ denote the mean value and standard deviation of the laser position in mm units, respectively. The resolutions of the levels used in proposed and conventional (with a high‐accuracy level) methods were 0.05mm/1,000mm and 0.44mm/1,000mm, respectively.