Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 30;6:e30493. doi: 10.7554/eLife.30493

Figure 1. Experimental setup to study membrane binding and unfolding of C2 domains and interactions between C2 domains.

(A) Schematic diagram of the experimental setup to pull a single C2 domain (E-Syt2 C2AB shown) anchored on a lipid bilayer supported on a silica bead. The inset shows the fluorescence image of the bilayer on a silica bead of 5 µm in diameter. (B) Domain diagrams of Syt1 and E-Syt2. The dashed lines mark the truncated domains used in this study. (C) Force-extension curves (FECs) obtained by pulling C2 domains in the presence of supported bilayers (black) or in its absence (blue). Red-dashed rectangles mark reversible membrane binding and unbinding, while the cyan dashed rectangle indicates reversible C2AB association and dissociation. Green and cyan arrows mark unfolding of C2A and C2B domains, respectively. The insets show the transient state 3. Throughout the text, the FECs were mean-filtered to 100 Hz and shown. The E-Syt2 C2AB was pulled in the presence of membranes composed of 75% POPC, 20% DOPS, 5% PI(4,5)P2, and 0.03% biotin-PEG-DSPE. E-Syt2 C2C and Syt1 C2AB were tested on membranes with a similar composition, except for a decrease in DOPS to 10% and a corresponding increase in POPC to 85%. The solution contained 25 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 200 mM NaCl, and 100 µM Ca2+ for E-Syt2 C2AB and Syt1 C2AB or no Ca2+ for E-Syt2 C2C. (D) Diagram of different C2 domain states derived from the FECs: 1, membrane-bound state; 2, unbound state with two associated C2 domains; 3, unbound state with two dissociated C2 domains; 4, state with a single folded C2 domain; 5, fully unfolded state.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Procedures to make membrane-coated silica beads.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

(A) Mix a total of 250 nmol lipids in 45 μL chloroform in a 15 mL glass tube. (B) Dry lipids under a nitrogen flow followed by lyophilization for 1 hr. (C) Hydrate dried lipids by adding 500 μL suspension buffer containing 25 mM HEPES, pH7.4, 200 mM NaCl. (D) Re-suspended lipids by pipetting up and down the solution. (E) Transfer the vesicle solution to an Eppendorf tube and sonicate the vesicle solution until the solution became clear. This step generates small unilamellar vesicles. (F) Centrifuge the vesicle solution at 15,000 g for 5 min to precipitate any large vesicles or lipid aggregates. Collect the small vesicles in the supernatant. (G) Add 70 μL silica beads with a diameter of 2.06 µm (Part number: SS04N, Bangs Laboratories, Inc, IN) into the vesicle solution. Vesicles spontaneously collapse on silica surfaces to form supported bilayers. (H) Vortex the beads at 1500 rpm in 37°C for 45 min to strip away excessive membranes from bead surfaces using Thermal Mixer C (Eppendorf). (I) Centrifuge the bead solution at 500 g and at room temperature for 1 min to precipitate the beads and then remove the excessive membranes in the supernatant. The membranes that cover the beads slightly shrank upon the temperature decrease (Petrache et al., 2000), which increased the tension of the membranes and their mechanical strength against the pulling force perpendicular to the membranes. (J) Add 1 mL suspension buffer and re-suspend the beads by pipetting the bead solution. Repeat the steps I and J twice to remove residual vesicles in the bead solution. All lipids were obtained from Avanti Polar Lipids (POPC: 850457P; DOPS: 840035P; Brain PI(4,5)P2: 840046X; DSPE-PEG(2000) Biotin: 880129P).

Figure 1—figure supplement 2. Lipid bilayers supported on silica beads are uniform and mobile.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2.

(A) Confocal fluorescence images of bilayers containing 1% NBD-labeled PE lipids. (B–E) Fluorescence images of the same bilayer taken before photobleaching (B) and at the indicated time after photobleaching (C–E).

Figure 1—figure supplement 3. Histogram distributions of the unfolding forces (top panel) and extension increases (bottom panel) associated with E-Syt2 C2A and C2B unfolding.

Figure 1—figure supplement 3.

The average unfolding force (F) and extension increase (dx) and the total number unfolding events measured (N) are indicated. The numbers in parenthesis represent the standard deviation.

Figure 1—figure supplement 4. Histogram distributions of the unfolding forces (top panel) and extension increases (bottom panel) associated with Syt1 C2A and C2B unfolding.

Figure 1—figure supplement 4.

The average unfolding force (F) and extension increase (dx) and the total number of unfolding events measured (N) are indicated. The numbers in parenthesis represents the standard deviation.

Figure 1—figure supplement 5. Force-extension curves (FECs) obtained by pulling Syt1 C2AB, C2A or C2B domain anchored on the supported bilayers (black) or on the streptavidin-coated beads without membranes (blue) in the presence (‘+') or absence of (‘-') of 100 µM Ca2+ in the solution.

Figure 1—figure supplement 5.

Green and cyan arrows indicated unfolding of C2A and C2B domains, respectively. While the C2A alone barely bound to membranes in our assay, the C2B alone bound to membranes in a Ca2+- and PI(4,5)P2-dependent manner (region marked by magenta rectangle, and Figure 1—figure supplement 6).

Figure 1—figure supplement 6. Extension-time trajectories (black) of Syt1 C2AB domain pair or individual C2A and C2B domains at the indicated constant mean forces and calcium concentrations and their idealized transition (red) derived from hidden-Markov modeling.

Figure 1—figure supplement 6.

Figure 1—figure supplement 7. Force-dependent unbinding probabilities (top) and transition rates (bottom) of Syt1 C2B domain.

Figure 1—figure supplement 7.

Unbinding probabilities and rates are indicated by solid symbols, while binding rates are shown by hollow symbols. Model fits (solid and dashed curves) of these measurements revealed the Syt1 C2B binding energy and kinetics (Table 1).