Table 2.
Multivariate Analysis of HRM Parameters Between Achalasia Subtypes
| Adjusted Odds Ratio |
P-value | 95% Confidence Interval |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Achalasia 1 vs Achalasia 2 | |||
| UES Length | 1.07 | NS | |
| UES Residual Pressure | 0.67 | 0.01 | 0.5–0.91 |
| UES Relaxation Time to Nadir | 1.00 | NS | |
| UES Recovery Time | 0.99 | 0.02 | 0.98–0.999 |
| Intrabolus Pressure | 0.69 | <0.001 | 0.56–0.85 |
| LES IRP | 1.02 | NS | |
| Achalasia 2 vs Achalasia 3 | |||
| UES Length | 1.71 | NS | |
| UES Residual Pressure | 1.22 | <0.0001 | 1.11–1.34 |
| UES Relaxation Time to Nadir | 1.00 | NS | |
| UES Recovery Time | 1.00 | 0.01 | 1.001–1.01 |
| Intrabolus Pressure | 0.95 | 0.03 | 0.91–0.99 |
| LES IRP | 1.03 | NS | |
| Achalasia 3 vs EGJOO | |||
| UES Length | 0.38 | 0.01 | 0.19–0.77 |
| UES Residual Pressure | 1.11 | 0.02 | 1.02–1.22 |
| UES Relaxation Time to Nadir | 1.00 | NS | |
| UES Recovery Time | 1.00 | NS | |
| Intrabolus Pressure | 1.01 | NS | |
| LES IRP | 1.16 | <0.001 | 1.07–1.26 |
| Achalasia 2 vs EGJOO | |||
| UES Length | 0.69 | NS | |
| UES Residual Pressure | 1.31 | <0.0001 | 1.20–1.42 |
| UES Relaxation Time to Nadir | 1.00 | NS | |
| UES Recovery Time | 1.00 | <0.01 | 1.001–1.01 |
| Intrabolus Pressure | 0.99 | NS | |
| LES IRP | 1.2 | <0.0001 | 1.12–1.30 |