Table 2.

Results of dose calculation using 10 S‐CTs, showing relative discrepancy of DVH‐parameters.

Relative Discrepancy of DVH‐Parameters
DVH‐Parameter	Mean (STD)	Range	95% Confidence Interval (t‐distribution)
$\text{PTV}-{\mathrm{D}}_{99}$	0.11% (0.13%)	$(-0.02\%–0.33\%)$	(0, 0.2%)
$\text{PTV}-{\mathrm{D}}_{95}$	0.09% (0.11%)	$(-0.04\%–0.28\%)$	(0, 0.17%)
$\text{Bladder}-{\mathrm{D}}_{50}$	0.07% (0.2%)	$(-0.23\%–0.43\%)$	$(-0.01\%,0.21\%)$
$\text{Rectum}-{\mathrm{D}}_{40}$	0.09% (0.12%)	$(-0.06\%–0.29\%)$	(0, 0.18%)
$\text{Rectum}-{\mathrm{D}}_5$	0.11% (0.15%)	$(-0.1\%–0.35\%)$	(0, 0.22%)
Femoral Region‐D1	0.07% (0.15%)	$(-0.08\%–0.32\%)$	(0, 0.17%)

PTV = planning target volume; STD = standard deviation; DVH = dose‐volume histogram.