Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 16;8:1539. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01478-4

Table 1.

List of MOFs and their defect scenarios leading to notable methane uptake enhancements

MOF CSD Refcode Modulators used % of linker vacancies Uptake—defect 65 bar (v STP/v) Uptake—pristine 65 bar (v STP/v) Uptake enhancement 65 bar (v STP/v) % of uptake enhancement
PAMHIW54 Formate 8.33 192.09 123.38 68.71 55.69
PAMHIW Water, OH 8.33 185.43 123.38 62.05 50.29
AXUBOL (IN) OH (water X) 5.56 171.52 112.56 58.95 52.37
AXUBOL (BDC) Formate 5.56 169.13 112.56 56.56 50.25
AXUBOL (BDC) Water, OH 5.56 169.04 112.56 56.48 50.17
KOCWEF (1) OH (water X) 6.25 107.03 71.65 35.38 49.38
HOMZEP55 Water, OH 8.33 164.35 129.78 34.57 26.64
UTEWOG56 Water, OH 6.25 197.94 163.43 34.50 21.11
UTEWUM56 Water, OH 6.25 195.87 163.19 32.68 20.03
XENZUN57 OH 6.25 138.01 105.43 32.57 30.90
XENZUN Formate 6.25 137.38 105.43 31.95 30.30
JEWYAM58 Water, OH 6.25 185.23 154.46 30.77 19.92
KOCWEF (2) Formate, tetrazolate 6.25 101.78 71.65 30.13 42.05
REGYOT59 Water, OH 6.25 193.98 166.00 27.98 16.85
QAGQEW60 Formate 6.25 193.73 165.82 27.91 16.83
KOCWEF (2) Water, OH 6.25 99.38 71.65 27.73 38.69
REGYOT Formate 6.25 193.50 166.00 27.49 16.56
QAGQEW Water, OH 6.25 192.09 165.82 26.27 15.84
ABEMIF61 Water, OH 6.25 162.62 136.95 25.67 18.74
VEXYON62 Water, OH 6.25 178.52 152.98 25.54 16.70
MUWQEB63 Water, OH 6.25 181.02 157.20 23.81 15.15

Entries are presented in the order of highest uptake enhancement to lowest uptake enhancement in (v STP/v) at 65 bar, 298 K