Table 4.
Parameter | Percentage change in parameter | Effect on treatment costs | Comments/justification |
---|---|---|---|
Malaria prevalence | 43% reduction in the rate used from 0.47 to 0.27 | Total and average costs significantly reduced by 37% | Indicates the significant impact of accuracy of diagnosis on the cost of treatment Change in rate to reflect the lower prevalence in a previous larger study as well as capture the impact of presumptive treatment |
Personnel salaries | 25% reduction in personnel cost | Treatment costs (total and average) reduced by 21% | High cost of personnel indicates significant contribution to the high costs of treatment |
50% reduction in personnel cost | Treatment costs reduced by 41% | ||
Discount rate | 3–5% | No significant change in treatment costs | Discount rate shows no impact on treatment costs Reflects standard practice in economic evaluations [26] |
3–10% | No significant change in treatment costs | ||
Drug costs | Increased by 25% | Total and average cost per case increased minimally at 2% | Drug prices do not significantly impact on the total cost of treatment |
Decreased by 25% | Total and cost per case reduced minimally at 3.3% |