Table 2.
Matrices and statistical analyses of alignments and cladograms inferred by maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI)
| Dataset | Genome | Terminals, n | Characters considering gaps, bp | Clades with support ≥50 %, n (%)1 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Posterior probability (BI) | Bootstraps (ML) | ||||
| rps16 | Plastid | 14 | 926 | 11 (84) | 10 (77) |
| trnL-trnF | Plastid | 22 | 1·091 | 16 (76) | 12 (57) |
| matK2 | Plastid | 23 | 883 | 19 (86) | 16 (72) |
| ITS | Nucleus | 17 | 962 | 12 (75) | 10 (62) |
| Combined | Nucleus + Plastid | 25 | 3·864 | 20 (83) | 17 (71) |
1
Percentage of clades was calculated from the total of possible tree clades (= terminal numbers−1).
2
Sequences obtained from GenBank (see Table 1) were trimmed to achieve a homologous region according to the fragment amplified by the 3F_KIM and 1R_KIM primers (Lim et al., 2012).