Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 13;12:1929–1939. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S149665

Table 2.

Baseline characteristics of the population

Variable Intervention group (CGA, unit)
N
Control group (conventional care)
N
p-value
Age, years, mean (SD) 206 85.7 (5.3) 202 85.6 (5.4) 0.850
Gender, female, n (%) 206 122 (59) 202 108 (53) 0.241
Frailty screening score, mean (SD) 206 3.5 (0.9) 202 3.4 (0.9) 0.149
Charlson’s index score, mean (SD) 206 7.4 (2.1) 202 6.2 (1.5) <0.001
Living alone, n (%) 206 139 (67) 202 132 (65) 0.649
Own living without home-help service, n (%) 206 60 (29) 202 77 (38) 0.055
Handgrip strength (kg), mean (SD) 184 18.8 (7.2) 153 18.0 (7.9) 0.330
6-MWT (m), mean (SD) 147 146 (103.4) 95 160 (100.0) 0.287
TUG (sec), mean (SD) 153 30.0 (23.2) 120 37.4 (28.6) 0.020
Reported reasons for admission, n (%)
 Dyspnea 206 67 (32) 202 65 (32)
 Worsened general condition/tiredness 206 48 (23) 202 43 (21)
 Pain 206 29 (14) 202 24 (12)
 Fever/infection 206 28 (14) 202 40 (20)
 Vertigo/falling 206 27 (13) 202 30 (15)
 Others 206 52 (25) 202 35 (17)

Notes: The baseline characteristics of the population divided by group, intervention group, and control group, and the main reasons that led to admission. Continuous data are presented as the mean ±1 SD. Nominal data are presented as number (%). Copyright © 2017. Dove Medical Press. Adapted from Ekerstad N, Karlson BW, Dahlin Ivanoff S, et al. Is the acute care of frail elderly patients in a comprehensive geriatric assessment unit superior to conventional acute medical care? Clin Interv Aging. 2017;12:1–9.40

Abbreviations: CGA, Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment; SD, standard deviation; 6-MWT, 6-minute walk test; TUG, timed up-and-go test.