Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 17.
Published in final edited form as: Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014 Dec 22;53(1):93–108. doi: 10.1597/14-027

TABLE 10.

Comparison of Intrarater Reliability for UK/I and NA Samples: Kappas and Strength of Agreement

Parameter UK/I Samples NA Samples


Kappas Strength of Agreement* Kappas Strength of Agreement
Intelligibility .84 Very good .70 Good
Voice .79 Good .75 Good
Hypernasality .84 Very good .85 Very good
Hyponasality .70 Good .62 Good
Audible nasal emission .70 Good .75 Good
Anterior oral CSCs .60 Moderate .81 Very good
Posterior oral CSCs .81 Very good .46 Moderate
Nonoral CSCs .84 Very good .85 Very good
Passive CSCs .81 Very good .78 Good
Need for intervention .69 Good .56 Moderate

This was titled “Recommend STx” in the NA data.