Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 17.
Published in final edited form as: Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014 Dec 22;53(1):93–108. doi: 10.1597/14-027

TABLE 7.

Interrater Reliability for NA Samples: Kappas, Strength of Agreement, and Mean % Agreement Rating 1 and Rating 2

Parameter Rating 1 Rating 2


Kappa Strength of Agreement* M % Agreement Kappa Strength of Agreement M % Agreement
Intelligibility .29 Fair 64 .28 Fair 48
Voice .10 Poor 71 .18 Poor 69
Hypernasality .71 Good 40 .70 Good 49
Hyponasality .39 Fair 73 .67 Good 70
Audible nasal emission .71 Good 71 .53 Moderate 69
Anterior oral CSCs .45 Moderate 47 .38 Fair 49
Posterior oral CSCs .06 Poor 79 .00 Poor 78
Nonoral CSCs .78 Good 83 .60 Moderate 71
Passive CSCs .55 Moderate 59 .72 Good 76
Recommend STx .26 Fair 81 .21 Fair 77
Recommend VPF Eval .69 Good 78 .63 Good 80

STx = speech intervention; VPF Eval = velopharyngeal function evaluation.