Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Aug 7.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017 Jul 12;56(33):9944–9948. doi: 10.1002/anie.201704786

Table 1.

Initial optimization of the asymmetric aziridination.

graphic file with name nihms915249u2.jpg

entry substrate Ag salt ligand yield A[a] yield I[a,b] ee A
1 1-(Z) AgClO4 L1 46% 7% 16%
2 1-(Z) AgClO4 L2 89% 10% 82%
3 1-(Z) AgClO4 L3 77% 6% 45%
4 1-(Z) AgClO4 L4 81% 11% 23%
5 1-(Z) AgClO4 L5 91% 9% (−)80%

6 1-(Z) AgOAc L2 29% 16% 6%
7 1-(Z) AgOTf L2 63% 10% 67%
8 1-(Z) AgOTf L5 86% 6% (−)81%
9 1-(Z) AgBF4 L2 92% 8% 71%
10 1-(Z) AgBF4[c] L2 55% 5% 76%
11 1-(Z) AgBF4 L5 74% 10% (−)67%
12 1-(Z) AgPF6 L2 69% 6% 71%
13 1-(Z) AgSbF6 L2 83% 5% 79%

14 2-(E) AgBF4 L2 73% 11% 83%
15 2-(E) AgPF6 L2 73% 13% 79%
16 2-(E) AgSbF6 L2 79% 8% 83%
17 2-(E) AgClO4 L2 79% 17% 85%
18 2-(E) AgClO4 L5 90% 10% (−)84%
[a]

NMR yield using mesitylene as internal standard.

[b]

I: C-H insertion byproduct.

[c]

NaBARF (BARF = tetrakis[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate) was employed as an additive.

graphic file with name nihms915249u3.jpg