Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Sci. 2017 Nov;18(8):943–954. doi: 10.1007/s11121-017-0817-x

Table 3.

School Dropout at Time 4: Bivariate and Multinomial Logistic Regression Analyses (N=767)

SCHOOL DROPOUT Intervention
Group
Control
Group
Rao-Scott
Chi-Square
Bivariate Analysis

Category and Description λ2=26.2***

0 Permanent Dropout – Never returned to school N=40(10.4%) N=75(19.7%)

1 Temporary Dropout – Dropped out and returned to school N=30(7.8%) N=56(14.7%)

2 Continuous Enrollment – Stayed in school N=316(81.9%) N=250(65.6%)

Multinomial Logistic Regression

Permanent Dropout vs. Continuous Enrollment Temporary Dropout vs. Continuous Enrollment Permanent Dropout vs. Temporary Dropout

OR CI OR CI OR CI

Condition (ref=Control) 0.41** 0.23–0.75 0.41** 0.21–0.80 0.98 0.52–1.87

Gender (ref=Male) 2.41*** 1.53–3.81 1.66 0.92–3.02 2.41 1.53–3.81

Age 1.56*** 1.31–1.86 1.37 *** 1.17–1.50 1.14 1.31–1.86

SES 0.94 0.84–1.04 0.97 0.87–1.09 0.94 0.87–1.09
*

p<05.

**

p<01.

***

p<001.