Table 5.
Summary of the hierarchical regression analyses to predict children’s implicitly measured math anxiety (i.e., by the numerical dot-probe task).
| Dependent | Predictors | β | R2 | ΔR2 | F | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Congruency effect – single digit | Mothers’ Numerical Task Anxiety | 0.47 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 7.43 | 0.01 |
| Congruency effect – double digit | Maternal pressure | 0.35 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 3.58 | 0.07 |
| Congruency effect – triple digit | Step 1 | |||||
| Mothers’ Years of Schooling | 0.37 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 4.18 | 0.05 | |
| Step 2 | ||||||
| Mothers’ Years of Schooling | 0.27 | 0.19 | 0.05 | 2.88 | 0.07 | |
| ISEI | 0.24 | |||||
| Congruency effect – math word | Maternal pressure | -0.38 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 4.46 | 0.04 |
Congruency effect, the difference between reaction time in the incongruent and congruent conditions in the numerical dot-probe task (Rubinsten et al., 2015); ISEI, the International Socioeconomic Index (Ganzeboom and Treiman, 1996).