Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 14;8:1959. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01959

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

When the proposal allocation ratio was 3:7, interpersonal responsibility played a more important role on responders’ hostile decision-making, which was reflected by rejection rate, whereas when the proposal allocation ratio was 5:5, 4:6.2:8 or 1:9, interpersonal responsibility had little effect. The meaning of “” was that there was a significant difference between individuals with high and low interpersonal responsibility when the proposal allocation ratio was 3:7.