Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 20;88(6):649–656. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1378533

Table 3.

10-year K–M survival data for revision due to aseptic loosening for the control groups, i.e. the 3 most common fixed bearing implants in each country

Country
 Group
Subgroup
(Implant type)
Tibial
fixation
Total (n) Revised
for aseptic
loosening
(n, ‰)
Median
follow-up
(years)
K–M survival
10 years
(%, 95% CI)
At risk (n)
Norway
 Control All Any 19,580 51 (3) 4.6 99.6 (99.4–99.8) 4,127
Profix Any 12,611 27 (2) 5.7 99.7 (99.5–99.9) 3,401
NexGen Any 5,347 11 (2) 1.2 99.6 (99.4–99.8) 952
AGC Any 1,622 13 (8) 6.6 99.0 (98.4–99.6) 623
Australia
 Control All Any 48,173 195 (4) 3.4 99.0 (98.8–99.2) 1,170
Triathlon Any 22,333 68 (3) 3.1 99.4 (99.2–99.6) 1,726
NexGen Any 16,609 76 (5) 3.3 99.2 (99.0–99.4) 1,459
PFC Sigma
fixed bearing Any 9,231 51 (6) 4.9 98.9 (98.5–99.3) 793