Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 14;88(6):681–687. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1338066

Table 6.

Distribution of fracture types in round 1 (CR: conventional radiography) and round 3 (CR + CT: CR + additional CT scan) of all 4 observers given in percentages

Frykman I II III IV V VI VII VIII
 CR 9 5 20 25 3 1 18 19a
 CR + CT 5 2 18 16 3 0 24 31a
Fernandez 1 2 3 4 5
 CR 18a 11a 50 1 20
 CR + CT 7a 21a 59 0 13
Universal 1 2A 2B 2C 3 4A 4B 4C
 CR 2 8 4 0 4 25 39 17
 CR + CT 1 5 1 0 9 27 32 24
AO groups A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 C1 C2 C3
 CR 12a 4 1 3 12 31a 30 6a
 CR + CT 2a 5 3 5 12 19a 32 22a
a

Significant changes in fracture distribution in that category.