Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 6;2017:5923696. doi: 10.1155/2017/5923696

Table 5.

Logistic Regression Model for ITN utilization.

Variables Bednets utilization OR (95% CI) P value
No Yes
N = 1024 N = 3720
Age
 15–29 years 595 (58.1) 1988 (53.4) 1
 30+ 429 (41.9) 1732 (46.6) 0.874 0.746–1.025 >.05
Attended school
 No 278 (27.1) 662 (17.8) 1
 Yes 746 (72.9) 3058 (82.2) 1.322 1.085–1.611 <.05
Urban
 No 385 (37.6) 1327 (35.7) 1
 Yes 639 (62.4) 2393 (64.3) 1.236 1.049–1.458 <.05
Marital status-live in union
 No 159 (15.5) 512 (13.8) 1
 Yes 865 (84.5) 3208 (86.2) 1.019 0.815–1.274 >.05
Knowledge cause of malaria
 No 139 (16.2) 334 (9.5) 1
 Yes 720 (83.8) 3166 (90.5) 1.378 1.09–1.742 <.05
Perception severity
 Low 167 (19.6) 413 (11.9) 1
 High 685 (80.4) 3069 (88.1) 1.189 0.949–1.489 >.05
Perception of the ITN
 Low 257 (30.1) 762 (21.9) 1
 High 597 (69.9) 2725 (78.1) 1.521 1.270–1.821 <.05
Self-efficacy
 Low 154 (18.1) 252 (7.2) 1
 High 698 (81.9) 3242 (92.8) 1.915 1.489–2.464 <.05
Norm social
 No 480 (55.9) 1356 (38.6) 1
 Yes 378 (44.1) 2156 (61.4) 1.930 1.645–2.265 <.05
Attitude: bednets are useful
 No 257 (30.0) 579 (16.5) 1
 Yes 600 (70.0) 2929 (83.5) 1.529 1.258–1.858 <.05

Containing missing values.