Supplementary Table 3.
Items | Cohort 1 (n = 4166) | Cohort 2 (n = 1978) | Cohort 3 (n = 808) | Cohort 4 (n = 244) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ΔLHR | P | ΔAIC | ΔLHR | P | ΔAIC | ΔLHR | P | ΔAIC | ΔLHR | P | ΔAIC | |
Removing Shanghai Score | −272.359 | <0.001 | 270.359 | −78.960 | <0.001 | 76.960 | −32.400 | <0.001 | 30.400 | −9.937 | 0.001 | 7.937 |
Removing BCLC | −0.981 | 0.320 | −1.019 | −28.185 | <0.001 | 26.185 | −0.151 | 0.698 | −1.849 | −1.454 | 0.224 | −0.546 |
Removing TNM | −1.277 | 0.257 | −0.723 | −0.855 | 0.356 | −1.145 | −0.127 | 0.724 | −1.873 | −0.172 | 0.679 | −1.828 |
Removing CLIP | −0.371 | 0.542 | −1.629 | −0.125 | 0.723 | −1.875 | −0.363 | 0.548 | −1.637 | −1.116 | 0.291 | −0.884 |
Removing OKUDA | −0.966 | 0.327 | −1.034 | −2.071 | 0.145 | 0.071 | −0.833 | 0.374 | −1.167 | −0.329 | 0.566 | −1.671 |
Removing C stage | 0 | 0.989 | −2.000 | −20.184 | <0.001 | 18.184 | −0.202 | 0.657 | −1.798 | −0.001 | 0.978 | −1.999 |
Removing UNOS | −0.052 | 0.820 | −1.948 | −22.213 | <0.001 | 20.213 | −0.169 | 0.685 | −1.831 | −1.790 | 0.177 | −0.210 |
Removing JIS score | −1.452 | 0.223 | −0.548 | −5.134 | 0.027 | 3.134 | −0.002 | 0.961 | −1.998 | −0.233 | 0.639 | −1.767 |
Removing Japan TNM | −0.906 | 0.337 | −1.094 | −4.531 | 0.036 | 2.531 | −0.005 | 0.941 | −1.995 | −1.360 | 0.266 | −0.640 |
Removing CUPI | −0.103 | 0.749 | −1.897 | −0.117 | 0.755 | −1.883 | −0.008 | 0.929 | −1.992 | −0.002 | 0.966 | −1.998 |
Removing Eastern System | −0.110 | 0.741 | −1.890 | −2.883 | 0.091 | 0.883 | −2.869 | 0.092 | 0.869 | −4.441 | 0.036 | 2.441 |
Removing HKLC | −0.061 | 0.805 | −1.939 | −0.127 | 0.721 | −1.873 | −1.797 | 0.182 | −0.203 | −1.617 | 0.201 | −0.383 |
*In multivariate analysis, the independent contribution of each staging system in the full model was assessed by removing the concerned system. ΔLHR was calculated by frst fitting full model and then removing one concerned system, at last ΔLHR = LHRremoving model - LHRfull model; the same to ΔAIC. Larger drop of ΔLHR and increase of AIC indicate more information of the removed system. LHR: Likelihood ratio; AIC: Akaike information criterion; BCLC: Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging; AJCC: American Joint Committee on Cancer; TNM: Tumor node metastasis; CLIP: Cancer of the Liver Italian Program score; CS: Chinese Staging; UNOS: United Network for Organ Sharing; JIS: Japan Integrated Staging score; CUPI: Chinese University Prognostic Index Staging; HKLC: Hong Kong Liver Cancer Staging System.