Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):417–431. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12151

Table 3.

Diagnostic characteristics—comparison of ECG markers using conventional cut‐offs, gender specific upper quartile cut‐offs for detection of stage B heart failure

Left ventricular hypertrophy Impaired global longitudinal strain Diastolic dysfunction (≥ stage I)
#LVH/total# at risk (PPV) #LVH/total# LVH (sensitivity) P #AbnGLS/total# at risk (PPV) #AbnGLS/total# AbnGLS (sensitivity) P #DD/total# at risk (PPV) #DD/total# DD (sensitivity) P
Single ECG marker and cut‐off
Cornell product 75th (m > 1442, f > 1518) 26/111 (23%) 26/58 (45%) <0.001 42/111 (38%) 42/142 (30%) 0.113 85/111 (77%) 85/289 (29%) 0.002
Abnormal PTFV1 (≤−4000 μV·ms) 17/156 (11%) 17/58 (29%) 0.338 48/156 (31%) 48/142 (34%) 0.740 105/156 (67%) 105/289 (36%) 0.390
Abnormal minSTmV5V6(≤−20 μV) 19/119 (16%) 19/58 (32%) 0.257 45/119 (38%) 45/142 (32%) 0.098 80/119 (67%) 80/289 (28%) 0.493
Abnormal heart rate(≥80 bpm) 5/57 (9%) 5/58 (9%) 0.312 26/57 (46%) 26/142 (18%) 0.016 45/57 (79%) 45/289 (16%) 0.016
Combined ECG markers
Presence of ≥1 abnormal ECG 44/296 (15%) 44/58 (76%) 0.096 96/296 (32%) 96/142 (68%) 0.672 205/296 (69%) 205/289 (71%) 0.004
Presence of ≥2 abnormal ECG 17/115 (15%) 17/58 (29%) 0.503 48/115 (42%) 48/142 (34%) 0.008 83/115 (72%) 83/289 (29%) 0.050
Presence of ≥3 abnormal ECG 5/29 (17%) 5/58 (9%) 0.480 15/29 (52%) 15/142 (11%) 0.017 24/29 (83%) 24/289 (8%) 0.035

DD, diastolic dysfunction; ECG, electrocardiogram; GLS, global longitudinal strain; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy; PPV, positive predictive value.

# = number of participants.