Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 29;4(4):595–604. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12177

Table 3.

Secondary and sensitivity analyses

Analysis No. of trials included No. of events RR 95% CI P for effect P for heterogeneity I 2 (%)
Levosimendan group Control group
Overall 6 33/207 39/113 0.40 0.27–0.59 <0.001 0.79 0
Placebo‐controlled trials 3 25/136 27/57 0.40 0.26–0.62 <0.001 0.62 0
Multicentre trials 3 25/136 27/57 0.40 0.26–0.62 <0.001 0.62 0
Lapse ≤2 weeks 3 17/85 21/45 0.39 0.23–0.65 <0.001 0.58 0
Lapse >2 weeks 3 16/122 18/68 0.42 0.23–0.74 0.003 0.55 0
Study period <6 months 3 23/88 24/41 0.45 0.29–0.69 <0.001 0.46 0
Study period ≥6 months 3 10/119 15/72 0.32 0.15–0.68 0.003 0.77 0
Loading dose used 2 5/48 7/39 0.43 0.16–1.19 0.10 0.31 2
Loading dose not used 4 28/159 32/74 0.39 0.26–0.59 <0.001 0.75 0
Excluding studies providing data via personal communication 3 21/137 26/63 0.35 0.22–0.57 <0.001 0.94 0
Analysis using inverse variance 6 33/207 39/113 0.42 0.29–0.61 <0.001 0.80 0
Analysis using Peto 6 33/207 39/113 0.24a 0.14–0.44a <0.001 0.83 0
Analysis using OR 6 33/207 39/113 0.25b 0.14–0.46b <0.001 0.85 0
Analysis using RD 6 33/207 39/113 −0.20c −0.31 to −0.08c <0.001 0.17 36d
Analysis removing each trial and reanalysing the dataset P < 0.001, 95% CI <1, and I 2 = 0% for all

CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; RD, risk difference; RR, risk ratio.

a

Peto OR and 95% CI for Peto OR are shown.

b

OR and 95% CI for OR are shown.

c

RD and 95% CI for RD are shown.

d

Data analysed with random‐effects model.