Independent degradation in genes of the plastid ndh gene family in species of the orchid genus Cymbidium (Orchidaceae; Epidendroideae)

Hyoung Tae Kim; Mark W Chase

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187318

. 2017 Nov 15;12(11):e0187318. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187318

Independent degradation in genes of the plastid ndh gene family in species of the orchid genus Cymbidium (Orchidaceae; Epidendroideae)

Hyoung Tae Kim ¹, Mark W Chase ^2,^*

Editor: Zhong-Jian Liu³

PMCID: PMC5695243 PMID: 29140976

Abstract

In this paper, we compare ndh genes in the plastid genome of many Cymbidium species and three closely related taxa in Orchidaceae looking for evidence of ndh gene degradation. Among the 11 ndh genes, there were frequently large deletions in directly repeated or AT-rich regions. Variation in these degraded ndh genes occurs between individual plants, apparently at population levels in these Cymbidium species. It is likely that ndh gene transfers from the plastome to mitochondrial genome (chondriome) occurred independently in Orchidaceae and that ndh genes in the chondriome were also relatively recently transferred between distantly related species in Orchidaceae. Four variants of the ycf1-rpl32 region, which normally includes the ndhF genes in the plastome, were identified, and some Cymbidium species contained at least two copies of that region in their organellar genomes. The four ycf1-rpl32 variants seem to have a clear pattern of close relationships. Patterns of ndh degradation between closely related taxa and translocation of ndh genes to the chondriome in Cymbidium suggest that there have been multiple bidirectional intracellular gene transfers between two organellar genomes, which have produced different levels of ndh gene degradation among even closely related species.

Introduction

The first two plastid genomes (plastomes) sequenced included the entire ndh 11-gene family, which is analogous to complex I in the mitochondrial genome (chondriome) [1, 2]. Subsequently, the function of the ndh plastome genes has been described in many studies. The Ndh complex codes for an NADH-specific dehydrogenase with low levels of expression [3, 4], and the family is involved in cyclic electron flow and chlororespiration [4, 5]. Recently, Yamori et al. [6] investigated the function of Ndh complex in low light. However, in spite of this role, the Ndh complex is dispensable for plant growth under optimal conditions [4], and an alternative cyclic electron transport pathway has been reported [7, 8]. Therefore, it has been suggested that ndh-lacking species in which at least one of ndh genes is non-functional may be able to use the alternative pathway for cyclic electron transport [9].

When the loss of the 11 ndh genes in Pinus thunbergii was reported [10], this striking feature was considered unique because ndhF had been found to be present in all other major sequenced vascular plant clades [11]. However, losses of ndh gene function have subsequently been reported in various clades of land plants. In bryophytes, the 11 ndh genes in the parasitic liverwort, Aneura mirabilis (synonym, Cryptothallis mirabilis), were partially or completely deleted [12], and ndhF of the leafy liverwort, Ptilidium pulcherrimum, was found to be a pseudogene [13]. In the fern clade, some leptosporangiate ferns had internal stop codons in ndh genes, but this seemed to be related RNA editing [14–16]. In gymnosperms, ndh gene losses have been reported in Pinaceae [10, 17–19] and Gnetales [20, 21]. Parasitic angiosperms have lost the function of ndh genes as well as other photosynthesis-related genes [22–25], but some autotrophs also lack the ndh gene [26–29].

Degradation of ndh in Orchidaceae is noteworthy from the perspective of the 11 ndh genes found in 743 angiosperm plastomes (Fig 1) (S1 Table). All 11 ndh genes had been coded into four classes [30], and different coding ndh gene patterns have been in each order based on the extent to which ndh genes were variously degraded. Reported plastome sequences of rosids comprise 32.5% of the 743 plastid genomes, but only the rosid order Geraniales have degraded ndh genes [28, 31]. With the exception of internal stop codons caused by 1-bp insertions or deletions (indels) in Asterales [32, 33], ndh gene degradation in the asterids is restricted to parasitic taxa in Lamiales and Solanales [23, 24, 34–37]. In monocots, the number of sequenced Poales is 21.4% of angiosperms, but only ndhA in some species seems to be a pseudogene caused by short indels.

In contrast, among Asparagales, in which most of the sequenced species are orchids, ndh degradation patterns vary considerably. Even though many orchids have all 11 ndh genes intact in their plastomes [9, 30, 38], a number of degraded ndh genes in photosynthetic orchids have been reported [9, 30, 39–44] in addition to those in non-photosynthetic Orchidaceae [45–49]. This result demonstrates that more ndh genes in Orchidaceae have been independently modified than in any other family of angiosperms. Therefore, to understand better ndh gene degradation, we focus here on orchid plastomes.

Degradation of ndh genes among genera in Orchidaceae seems to be independent [9, 30], but the scale of variation among closely related species level has yet to be investigated. The plastomes of the two Phalaenopsis species sequenced had similar ndh gene degradation patterns [41], which was observed as well as in the plastome of Phalaenopsis hybrids [30]. Most ndh genes in the eight species of Cymbidium sequenced were full-length, although some of them had frame-shift mutations that render them functionless [43]. Degradation of ndh in subtribe Oncidiinae varied slightly among genera [40]. However, 15 of the reported Oncidiinae were complex hybrids, and it was difficult to determine the ancestral character status of ndh gene degradation among these. Comparative analysis of ten species of coralroot orchids [48] and two species of a distantly related genus, Epipogium [49], all of which are holomycoheterotrophic, indicated ndh genes had become pseudogenes or were completely deleted in each of their common ancestors. However, recently submitted plastome sequences of Cymbidium in GenBank showed different ndh gene deletions among individuals within species. Therefore, it seems that ndh genes in Cymbidium may be being actively degraded and that an investigation of ndh gene status will help us understand broader patterns of ndh gene degradation in Orchidaceae.

In this paper, 11 ndh loci among 23 Cymbidium species including hybrids and three closely related taxa are analyzed for ndh gene degradation. Except for ndhF, we tried to investigate all ndh genes. The ndhF gene was completely deleted in some species in Cymbidium or contained a number of internal homopolymer regions, which we assume indicates non-functional genes. Therefore, we confirmed only the presence of ndhF in each plastome. Additionally, we analyzed NGS data to determine if ndh genes had been translocated to the chondriome [9] because we found multiple copies of some ndh genes in Cymbidium species in our investigations.

Results

Ten ndh loci among 23 Cymbidium species and three closely related taxa

Four regions (ndhB, ndhJ-K-C, ndhD, ndhE-G-I-A-H) that included ten ndh genes from 23 Cymbidium species and three outgroups were amplified by PCR and sequenced (Table 1). However, some intergenic or coding regions could not be sequenced because they contained homopolymers and polyA/T-polyG/C or problematic secondary structure (inverted repeats). To identify indels in ten ndh genes among 23 Cymbidium species and three closely related taxa, the fully intact (functional) ndh genes of Masdevallia coccinea were used as reference sequence.

Table 1. Taxa list for this study.

Subgenus ^a	Section ^b	Species	DNA bank number or living collection number
Cymbidium	Austrocymbidium	Cymbidium madidum	O-1472
	Bigibbarium	Cymbidium devonianum	^*
	Cymbidium	Cymbidium atropurpureum	O-1465
	Cymbidium	Cymbidium finlaysonianum	1954–41302 BEAK
	Floribundum	Cymbidium floribundum	O-1461
	Floribundum	Cymbidium pumilum	O-1469
	Floribundum	Cymbidium suavissimum	O-1467
	Himantophyllum	Cymbidium dayanum	O-1468
Cyperorchis	Annamaea	Cymbidium erythrostylum	O-1471
	Cyperorchis	Cymbidium eburneum	O-1505
	Cyperorchis	Cymbidium elegans	O-1479
	Cyperorchis	C. eburneum x C. hookerianum	O-1481
	Cyperorchis	Cymbidium erythraeum	O-1463
	Cyperorchis	Cymbidium giganteum	O-69
	Cyperorchis	Cymbidium hookerianum	O-1466
	Cyperorchis	Cymbidium insigne	O-1475
	Cyperorchis	Cymbidium iridioides	O-1462
	Cyperorchis	Cymbidium lowianum	O-1476
	Cyperorchis	Cymbidium mastersii	O-1506
	Cyperorchis	Cymbidium sanderae	O-1470
	Cyperorchis	Cymbidium whiteae	O-1473
	Parishiella	Cymbidium tigrinum	17717
Jensoa	Jensoa	Cymbidium ensifolium ^c	O-1478
	Jensoa	Cymbidium goeringii	O-1477
	Jensoa	Cymbidium kanran ^c	O-1499
	Jensoa	Cymbidium lancifolium ^c	O-293
	Jensoa	Cymbidium sinense ^c	O-1503
Outgroup		Acriopsis sp.	9060
		Grammatophyllum speciosum	1983–2947 BACR 450
		Thecostele secunda	O-406

Open in a new tab

^a: Subgeneric delimitation of Cymbidium is based on Du Puy and Cribb [50]

^b: Sectional delimitation of Cymbidium is based on Du Puy and Cribb [50]

^c: The plastome sequence of these species have been reported by Yang et al. [43] and directly submitted by Kim et al. in NCBI. Therefore, these four species are used for confirming the location of ndh genes to mitochondrial genome.

*: Only fresh leaves were collected from Ratcliffe Orchids, Ltd. (Hampshire, UK)

Except for C. tigrinum in which only half of exon1 is present and C. mastersii in which the 5′ region failed to produce sequence, all Cymbidium species were documented to contain a full-length ndhB gene (S1A Fig). A 1-bp insertion at 37 bp downstream of the 5′ end of ndhB results in a frame-shift mutation in ndhB in reported plastome sequences of Cymbidium, and this was also identified in all Cymbidium species studied here and the closely related Acriopsis and Thecostele accessions (subtribe Cymbidiinae)[51]. A large deletion including exon1, intron and exon2 was detected in ndhB of Acriopsis.

The ndhJ-K-C region was more variable than that of ndhB (S1B Fig). A 12-bp direct repeat was distributed 63 bp downstream of the 5′ end of ndhC and 69~82 bp downstream of 3′ end of ndhJ in most Cymbidium species. However, the sequence between the direct repeats was only deleted in C. goeringii, a result that conflicts with the complete plastome sequence of same species in GenBank (NC_028524), but this was based on a different individual of that species. Deletions caused by direct repeat sequences were also found in the 5′ region of ndhJ in three Cymbidium species (C. floribundum, C. erythrostylum, and C. tigrinum), Acriopsis and Thecostele. Unexpectedly, two copies of ndhJ-K-C region were detected in C. atropurpureum. Type I was similar to other Cymbidium sequences, whereas type II contained a 87-bp insertion 39 bp downstream of the 5′ end of ndhK. This 87 bp insertion is not present in any other of the 743 angiosperm plastomes in GenBank. Only C. madidum, C. finlaysonianum and the mt copy of ndhK in all Cymbidium species contained sequences of this same type.

The ndhD regions of Cymbidium were relatively conserved (S2A Fig). Large deletions were located in the 3′ region of the gene. Some of these occurred between direct repeat sequences.

The largest deletion of ndh genes in Cymbidium was identified in the ndhE-G-I-A-H region (S2B Fig), the end points of which were commonly located in an extremely AT-rich region. In particular, deletion of ndhA exon1 and ndhH in C. goeringii corresponded to those occurring in the plastomes of C. ensifolium, C. kanran, C. lancifolium and C. macrorhizon even though the plastome of different individuals of C. ensifolium (NC_028525) and C. goeringii (NC_028524) contained full length pt-ndhA and ndhH.

Different types of the ycf1-rpl32 region in Cymbidium

The ycf1-rpl32 region of the sequenced plastomes of Cymbidium was subdivided into two different types in comparison with that of M. coccinea (Fig 2A). Type A ycf1-rpl32 was similar to the reference, whereas 420 bp of 3′ region of ndhF was replaced with ycf1 sequence in type B ycf1-rpl32.

Cymbidium dayanum in subg. Cymbidium and nine species of subg. Cyperorchis contained type A ycf1-rpl32, which was highly conserved (Fig 2B). In contrast to type A ycf1-rpl32, type B ycf1-rpl32 of Cymbidium had number of indels in 3′ region of ndhF (Fig 2C). The type B ycf1-rpl32 of C. sinense sequenced in this paper was only 87% similar to that of C. sinense plastome owing to many indels. Type B ycf1-rpl32 was also found in three Cymbidium species in which plastid ndhF was completely deleted. In comparison to type B ycf1-rpl32, type C ycf1-rpl32 had large deletion in the 3′ region of ndhF, and the end point of the deletion corresponded to the end point of the replaced ycf1 region (Fig 2C and 2D).

Type D ycf1-rpl32 in which ndhF was completely deleted was found in half of the Cymbidium species examined and the three closely related taxa with a high level of similarity among them (Fig 2E). In comparison with type A ycf1-rpl32, two large deletions occurred in type D ycf1-rpl32; one was the complete deletion of ndhF and the other was an intergenic deletion between ndhF and rpl32.

Multiple copies of ndh genes in Orchidaceae

The 38 ndh partial sequences were detected from 15 contigs using four sets of NGS data from Orchidaceae (Table 2). With the exception of one contig in C. lancifolium, the ratio of the depth of mt-ndh genes to the depth of plastome in 15 contigs was 5.5~14.5, and BLAST results confirmed that they were derived from the chondriome.

Table 2. The information of mt-ndh genes assembled from NGS data.

Taxa	Region	Accession	Length	Average depth of mt-ndh gene / Average depth of plastome	Reference
*Cymbidium macrorhizon* (4 contigs)	ndhA	KX962303	2176	48.3 / 459.2
	ndhB	KX962302	2036	25.5 / 459.2
	ndhC	KX962305	356	39.9 / 459.2
	ndhD	KX962303	236	43.9 / 459.2
	ndhE	KX962303	284	57.4 / 459.2
	ndhF	KX962304	1910	41.4 / 459.2
	ndhF	KX962304	779	31.4 / 459.2
	ndhG	KX962303	497	48.4 / 459.2
	ndhH	KX962303	1127	39.5 / 459.2
	ndhI	KX962303	464	48.0 / 459.2
	ndhJ	KX962305	362	44.0 / 459.2
	ndhK	KX962305	867	46.9 / 459.2
*Cymbidium lancifolium* (6 contigs)	ndhA	KX962298	2199	35.3 / 318.7
	ndhB	KX962296	2047	25.8 / 318.7
	ndhC	KX962301	356	13.1 / 318.7
	ndhD	KX962297	773	23.0 / 318.7
	ndhD	KX962298	236	20.8 / 318.7
	ndhE	KX962298	284	40.2 / 318.7
	ndhF	KX962300	2100	39.8 / 318.7
	ndhF	KX962299	955	32.8 / 318.7
	ndhG	KX962298	497	24.8 / 318.7
	ndhH	KX962298	1127	29.4 / 318.7
	ndhI	KX962298	464	22.3 / 318.7
	ndhJ	KX962301	362	6.4 / 318.7
	ndhK	KX962301	811	6.6 / 318.7
*Dendrobium catenatum* (4 contigs)	ndhA	KX962306	1537	779.9 / 7687.6	SRR2084072
	ndhA	KX962306	575	739.8 / 7687.6	SRR2084072
	ndhC	KX962309	355	671.5 / 7687.6	SRR2084072
	ndhD	KX962307	1323	751.0 / 7687.6	SRR2084072
	ndhE	KX962307	306	780.6 / 7687.6	SRR2084072
	ndhF	KX962308	1600	738.6 / 7687.6	SRR2084072
	ndhG	KX962307	212	1118.4 / 7687.6	SRR2084072
	ndhH	KX962306	1155	664.9 / 7687.6	SRR2084072
	ndhI	KX962306	501	731.5 / 7687.6	SRR2084072
	ndhJ	KX962309	472	626.7 / 7687.6	SRR2084072
	ndhK	KX962309	610	636.7 / 7687.6	SRR2084072
*Epipogium aphyllum* (1 contig)	ndhA	KX962310	215	28.7 / 216.8	SRR1344939
	ndhA	KX962310	425	29.4 / 216.8	SRR1344939
	ndhI	KX962310	684	15.1 / 216.8	SRR1344939

Open in a new tab

The contig that contained the ndhJ-K-C region in C. lancifolium was present in relatively lower depth and did not contain a mitochondrial region, but there were only two SNPs and one indel that differed among the mt-ndhJ-K-C region in C. lancifolium and C. macrorhizon. Consequently, we concluded all 16 contigs have been translocated from the plastome to the chondriome.

Two Cymbidium species in section Pachyrhizanthe

All 11 ndh genes have been found in the chondriome of two Cymbidium species, and most of them do not differ in these two species. The mt-ndhB gene lacked 44 bp of exon1 and contained a 132-bp deletion in exon2 (Fig 3A). Similarities of the ndhB genes in the same genome among different species were 99.0 and 99.5%. However, those in the genomes of two accessions of same species were only 91.1 and 91.9% similar. Mt-ndhJ and ndhK contained a large deletion and insertion, respectively (Fig 3B). The length variation of insertion in mt-ndhK between two Cymbidium species was due to tandem repeats of 28 bp sequence. Even though plastid ndhF was completely deleted, two copies of mt-ndhF were found in two Cymbidium species (Fig 3C). One copy of these was similar to ndhF in type B ycf1-rpl32, and the other was similar to ndhF in type C ycf1-rpl32. In comparison with their plastome sequence, mt-ndhD was truncated and mt-ndhA and ndhH genes were almost full length (Fig 3D). In addition, another mt-ndhD (773 bp) was found in C. lancifolium.

Fig 3 — A red dotted-box indicates a plastome-like region in the chondriome. A) The plastid *ndhB* region from 44 bp downstream of 5′ end of gene was transferred to chondriome. At exon2 of mt-*ndhB*, a 132 bp deletion was found. B) The mt-*ndhJ-K-C* region contained a large deletion in and a large insertion in mt-*ndhK*. The length variation between two large insertions in mt-*ndhK* was caused by 28 bp tandem repeats. C) In contrast with deleted plastid *ndhF*, two types of mt-*ndhF* were found in both species. D) Both *ndhA* exon1 and *ndhH* were deleted in the plastome, whereas they were found in the chondriome of both species.

Dendrobium catenatum

The nine mt-ndh genes were found in four large contigs (Table 2). Among them, three contigs could form subgenomic circles [52]. Because a number of pt-ndh genes of D. catenatum have been deleted [53], we used a completely intact set of pt-ndh genes as a reference sequence, in this case Sobralia.

The region of mt-ndhJ-K-C was similar to the reference sequence in length with the exception of a large deletion in mt-ndhK, whereas pt-ndhK and ndhC were completely absent (Fig 4A). Mt-ndhF was longer than pt-ndhF, but both of them were highly truncated (Fig 4B). The regions between 194 bp downstream of rpl32 and 317 bp downstream of the 5′ end of ndhG were relatively conserved between pt- and mt-ndh genes, but the 3′ region of ndhD had a large deletion in both genomes (Fig 4C). The regions with pt-ndhI and ndhA exon2 were deleted [53], whereas these genes were found in chondriome but with a large inversion upstream of 5′ end of ndhG and downstream of the 5′ end of ndhA (Fig 4D).

Fig 4 — A red dotted-box indicates a plastome-like chondriome region. The plastid *ndh* genes of *Sobralia callosa* were used as reference. A) In contrast with plastid *ndhJ-K-C* region of D. *catenatum*, mt-*ndhJ-K-C* region was similar to the reference in length with the exception of deletion in mt-*ndhK*. B) Both plastid and mt-*ndhF* of D. *catenatum* contained large deletions. C) The plastid region of D. *catenatum* from downstream of *rpl32* to downstream of 5′ end of *ndhG* was transferred to the chondriome. D) The *ndhI-A-H* region in the chondriome of D. *catenatum* has a mt-*ndhI-A* exon2 region that is inverted relative to the reference, whereas this region was completely deleted in the plastome. E) Plastome of E. *aphyllum* has completely deleted all 11 *ndh* genes, whereas its chondriome has retained an *ndhI-A* region; there was an inversion between 3′ region of *ndhI* and upstream of 5′ end *ndhA* exon2.

Epipogium aphyllum

We found mt-ndhI and ndhA genes in achlorophyllous (holomycotrophic) E. aphyllum, but all pt-ndh genes in this species were completely deleted [49]. Unexpectedly, there was also an inversion mutation like that found in mt-ndhI-A of D. catenatum (Fig 4E).

Phylogenetic relationships between pt- and mt-ndh genes in Orchidaceae

In most ndh-gene trees (S3 Fig), the mt-ndh genes of Cymbidium formed a clade. It was noteworthy that the clustering of mt-ndhD, ndhE and ndhG from the NGS data and direct sequencing was strongly supported. However, the mt-ndhH genes of section Pachyrhizanthe formed a clade with the pt-ndhH genes of previously sequenced Cymbidium plastomes [43], whereas all pt-ndhH genes of Cymbidium sequenced in this study formed a strongly supported cluster. In addition, the ndhJ, ndhK and ndhC genes of C. madidum, C. finlaysonianum and type II C. atropurpureum formed a cluster with mt-ndhJ, ndhK and ndhC of section Pachyrhizanthe. The second copy of mt-ndhD in C. lancifolium clustered with the mt-ndhD of Oncidium, and they formed a strongly supported group with other orchid mt-ndhD genes. The clustering of the pt-ndhG of C. ensifolium (NC_028525) and mt-ndhG from other species of Cymbidium was strongly supported, whereas another pt-ndhG from C. ensifolium (KU179434) formed a group with pt-ndhG in Cymbidium.

Multiple copies of the mt-ndh genes from Erycina pusilla (subtribe Oncidiinae) formed a unique cluster with the exception of one copy of mt-ndhD (246 bp), which was relatively shorter than other mt-ndhD genes (480~1078 bp) in E. pusilla. Furthermore, these mt-ndh genes clustered with their pt-counterparts with the exception of pt-ndhA, ndhI and ndhE, which were truncated or missing from the plastome of E. pusilla.

The mt-ndhA, ndhD, ndhE, ndhG, ndhH, ndhI and ndhJ genes in Masdevallia picturata were most closely related to the pt-ndh genes of Masdevallia, and almost all mt-ndh genes in Paphiopedilum also formed clusters with the pt-ndh genes of these species.

Discussion

Patterns of ndh degradation in Cymbidium

Function of ndh genes has been independently lost in some orchid clades [9, 30]. With the exception of the directly sequenced plastomes of Goodyera, ndh-missing/non-intact species and ndh-intact species have not been so far found in same genus of Orchidaceae [41, 43, 48], in contrast to the situation in Erodium [27, 28]. Therefore, loss of function in the ndh complex seems to have occurred in the common ancestor of the ndh-missing/non-intact species within those genera rather than independently at the species level. The situation for ndhB in Cymbidium indirectly supports this scenario. With the exception of inverted repeat (IR)-deleted species, this gene is normally located in the IR, which position seems to play a role in its structural stability [54]. Substitution rates of the IR are also lower than those of single copy regions [55–59]. Therefore, ndhB is structurally more conserved than other ndh genes that are located in the single copy regions. In Cymbidium species, a 1-bp insertion at 37 bp downstream of the 5′ end of ndhB has been found in all species with the exception of the species that contain a truncated copy of ndhB. Therefore, at least, the ancestor of all Cymbidium species is likely to have lacked a functional ndh complex.

The first sequenced plastomes of Cymbidium [43] and directly uploaded sequences (NC_028525 and NC_028524) contained full-length ndh genes even though most of them were pseudogenes due to frameshift mutations. However, recently a sequenced plastome of Cymbidium lacked pt-ndhF, ndhH and ndhA exon1. As a result, there are two plastomes of C. ensifolium with different ndh gene content. With the exception of technical errors (misidentification at the time of collection or laboratory errors), which is difficult to determine in this study, our results support the hypothesis that Cymbidium species have undergone dynamic and recent ndh gene degradation. Because the common ancestor of all Cymbidium species seems to have lacked ndh function, many different substitutions and indels may have accumulated in the various species due to relaxed selection. The large deletions that caused ndh degradation should be shared between closely related taxa if ndh gene degradation had occurred in an ancestral pseudogene further in the past. However, most of the large deletions detected are unique in each accession.

In addition, one of the main factors involved in ndh gene degradation is likely to be intracellular recombination. A number of deletions have been found between direct repeat sequences or extremely AT-rich (homopolymer) regions. These patterns have been known to relate to intramolecular recombination [60, 61] and illegitimate recombination [62], respectively. These results suggest that the plastomes in Cymbidium species have undergone independent ndh gene degradation, probably after they speciated. The different levels of plastid ndh gene degradations in different individuals of C. ensifolium and C. goeringii also support a hypothesis of recent ndh gene degradation in Cymbidium.

However, we cannot suggest a clear explanation for why there appears to be a recent burst in this activity in the extant species of Cymbidium. In contrast, the ndh-lacking genera of photosynthetic orchids, i.e. Phalaenopsis [41], Oncidium, Paphiopedilum [30], Dendrobium and Bletilla, have retained similar ndh gene degradation patterns among their species. In general, with the exception of extremely reduced mycoheterotrophic orchids [45, 49], a number of pseudogenes have been retained in the plastomes of Orchidaceae [46–48]. In particular, the closely related green and non-green coralroot orchids (Corallorhiza), which have lost some ndh genes, are similar in plastid genome size [48]. Therefore, the plastome of Orchidaceae may be prone to retain its size due to some selective constraints.

Barrett et al. [47] hypothesised that non-functional genes in mycoheterotrophic plants may have undergone point mutations and frame-shift mutations under relaxed selective pressure over time, and large deletions occur rarely after purifying selection on non-functional genes ceases. Unlike other genera in Orchidaceae, the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of Cymbidium seems to have been under selective genome size constraint even though ndh function had been lost. However, structural mutations like bidirectional homologous recombination between the two organellar genomes or gene conversion in ndhF after splitting of populations or speciation might have led the plastome to be under relaxed selective constraints. As a result, it is likely that dynamic ndh gene degradation has occurred among Cymbidium species, perhaps even among populations.

Diverse ndhF genes result from gene conversion and indels

The first five Cymbidium species studied previously had full-length plastid ndhF genes [43], but ndhF deletions occurred in four recently submitted sequences. As we reported for the ndhA-H region, the deleted pt-ndhF genes of C. lancifolium and C. macrorhizon were transferred to chondriome (Fig 3C). As a result, C. sinense contains type B ycf1-rpl32 in its plastome and type D ycf1-rpl32 in its chondriome, whereas C. kanran, C. ensifolium, C. macrorhizon and C. lancifolium contain type D ycf1-rpl32 in their plastomes and type B ycf1-rpl32 in their chondriomes. Other Cymbidium species also contain different types of ycf1-rpl32 in their organellar DNAs, but we do not know in which genomes these are located. Species that have the same type of the ycf1-rpl32 region are not related to each other (i.e. they belong to different clades in the Cymbidium phylogenetic tree). Nevertheless, four types of the ycf1-rpl32 region seem to be related each other.

Type A ycf1-rpl32 is similar to that of other Orchidaceae, whereas 420 bp of the 3`region of ndhF in type B ycf1-rpl32 is similar to the ycf1 region and contained a number of indels. The ndhF sequence near IR_B/SSC was replaced with ycf1 near SSC/IR_A. This replacement might result from IR expansion via gene conversion [63](S4 Fig). First, recombination was initiated within the IR. Then, a Holliday junction on the IR was moved to SSC, creating heteroduplex DNAs. These heteroduplex DNAs were repaired using the complementary strand as the model. Finally, base substitutions and indels occurred in the ycf1 like region in ndhF. Significantly, an end point for deletion of ndhF in Acriopsis and Thecostele was identical to that of a ycf1-like region in ndhF of C. tortisepalum (Fig 2C and 2D). Therefore, it is possible that type C ycf1-rpl32 was derived from type B ycf1-rpl32 due to deletion of a chimeric region.

Kim et al. [30] described the important role of ndhF in the instability of the IR/SSC junction in Orchidaceae. Retention of full-length ndhF seems to be related to the selective constraints that maintain the IR/SSC boundary. The ndhF of the type B ycf1-rpl32 region is similar to ndhF in type A ycf1-rpl32 in length, but in its content is similar to the truncated version of ndhF due to the replacement of 3`end region of ndhF. As a result, it seems that gene conversion leads to relaxed selective constraint of the IR/SSC junction, after which truncated ndhF versions in type B and type C ycf1-rpl32 may be followed by ndhF deletion as in type D ycf1-rpl32.

Intracellular gene transfers between organellar DNA

Chang et al. [39] confirmed the in-frame sequences of ndhA, ndhF and ndhH that are completely deleted in the plastome of Phalaenopsis aphrodite and suggested that they were transferred to nuclear genome. However, in the recently published whole genome of P. equestris [64], it was shown that there was also no intact ndh gene [30]. Subsequently, mt-ndh genes were found in many unrelated clades of Orchidaceae [9], and we also found mt-ndh genes in several distantly related species. Therefore, intact ndh genes that are deleted from the plastome of Phalaenopsis are likely to be found in its chondriome. However, this is not surprising because such transfers are known to occur widely in seed plants [65–68].

To evaluate relationships between plastid and mitochondrial copies of ndh genes in Orchidaceae, we constructed gene trees (S3 Fig), which gave us information about ndh gene transfer, although some nodes are not well resolved. First, it is likely that the transfers of ndh genes from plastome to chondriome have usually occurred in the MRCA of the species in each genus. As there is limited ndh gene information at the species level, especially for mt-ndh genes, it is impossible to infer a time for these transfers. However, many of the pt- and mt-ndh genes from a given genus cluster together. For instance, mt-ndhC, ndhD, ndhG, ndhH and ndhJ of Erycina pusilla (subtribe Oncidiinae) were transferred after Erycina diverged from its common ancestor with Oncidium (subtribe Oncidiinae). The mt-ndh genes in Masdevallia picturata (subtribe Laeliinae, subfamily Epidendroideae) and Paphiopedium (subfamily Cypripedioideae) were also sister to pt-ndh genes of species within each genus, respectively.

In the ndh tree of Cymbidium, most mt-ndh genes are distantly located from their pt-ndh counterparts, and the entire mt-ndhD-E-G-I-A-H region can be assembled from NGS data for two species, which we confirmed by PCR of the mt-ndhD-E-G region in six Cymbidium species. These mt-ndh genes clustered uniquely with strong support. Although the combined ndh gene tree for ten species of Cymbidium had a different topology from that of combined ITS+matK [69], it is clear that the transfer of the ndh genes in the single-copy region dates back at least to the common ancestor of these Cymbidium species.

Secondly, transfers between the chondriome of photosynthetic orchids have occurred more than once. The mt-ndhD genes of Cymbidium (Cymbidiinae) and Erycina (Oncidiinae) were divided into two groups. The mt-ndhD genes (from mt-ndhD-E-G region) of Cymbidium and Erycina clustered with mt-ndhD genes in same genus. However, another copy of mt-ndhD gene in C. lancifolium and Erycina formed a strongly supported cluster with the mt-ndhD genes from Oncidesa Gower Ramsey (a complex hybrid between species in Oncidium and Gomesa, most likely with the plastid genome of the former) and a member of another subfamily Goodyera fumata (tribe Cranichidae, subfamily Orchidoideae). These four mt-ndhD genes clustered with mt-ndhD gene of D. catenatum (tribe Malaxidae, subfamily Epidendroidae), to which the plastid ndhD of Dendrobium was an outlier with moderate support. It is therefore likely that mt-ndhD of Dendrobium has been directly transferred independently to the other four species [70]. In addition, mt-ndhE of Oncidesa Gower Ramsey (subfamily Epidendroideae) and V. planfolia (subfamily Vanilloideae) are identical. Although the substitution rate of the chondriome is slower than in plastid DNA [52], it is unlikely that mt-ndhE of two species originated in their common ancestor because of the long time, before the end of the Cretaceous, since the members of these orchid subfamilies diverged [70]. Consequently, our results suggest a recent transfer of mt-ndh gene between distantly related taxa in Orchidaceae. Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) between photosynthetic orchids has not been reported so far. However, multiple mt-genes from different lineages have been transferred into the chondriome of Geraniaceae [71]. Because there is little information of the chondriome of Orchidaceae, it is difficult to figure out how and when this HGT might have occurred.

Unidirectional vs bidirectional IGT

The most remarkable feature of ndh genes in Cymbidium is the presence of multiple copies in their organellar genomes. For example, C. sinense has a type B ycf1-rpl32 in its plastome and type D ycf1-rpl32 in its chondriome, whereas C. kanran, C. ensifolium, C. macrorhizon and C. lancifolium have type D ycf1-rpl32 in their plastomes and type B ycf1-rpl32 in their mt-DNA. Some species also have other types, e.g. ycf1-rpl32 types A and D. It is highly perplexing that Cymbidium species can have different types of the ycf1-rpl32 region in one genome (plastome or chondriome) and the same type of ycf1-rpl32 region in different genomes. We have two hypotheses that could explain this phenomenon: C. sinense and C. macrorhizon represent non-functional ndhF (type A, B and C) and completely ndhF-deleted species (type D), respectively.

The first hypothesis is unidirectional transfer (Fig 5A). The ycf1-rpl32 region containing ndhF (ancestral type) was transferred to its chondriome. Subsequently, the mt-ndhF (C. sinense) and pt-ndhF (C. macrorhizon) were independently deleted. The second hypothesis is bidirectional transfer (Fig 5B). In this scenario, the ycf1-rpl32 region containing plastid ndhF was transferred to chondriome in the ancestor of Cymbidium and closely related genera of subtribe Cymbidiinae. After this transfer, the mt-ndhF copy was eliminated by gene rearrangements or gene deletion (as in C. sinense). Some species then underwent homologous recombination between the two ycf1-rpl32 copies in their plastomes and chondriomes (e.g. C. macrorhizon).

Type D ycf1-rpl32 among Cymbidium and three closely related taxa is highly conserved and shares two large deletions (Fig 2). The first hypothesis therefore must assume that two deletions in ycf1-rpl32 in both the plastome and chondriome have occurred at exactly the same position in all Cymbidium species and closely related taxa. However, the second hypothesis more easily explains this high level of similarity of the type D ycf1-rpl32 region among these genera because it originated in their common ancestor and mt-DNA has low substitution rate [52]. Similarly, because the plastid ndhH genes of previously sequenced Cymbidium plastomes have been re-transferred from chondriome, it is likely that they should cluster with the mt-ndhH genes of Cymbidium section Pachyrhizanthe.

In relative terms, the plastid genome is ten times more abundant that the mitochondrial genome of D. catenatum. This means that plastid regions are easier to amplify than mt-region even if the mt-region had exactly the same primer binding sites as the plastid copy. With the exception of C. atropurpureum, only one PCR product of the plastid ndhJ-K-C region was produced from all Cymbidium species and three related species studied here, and the plastid copies of ndhJ, ndhK and ndhC all clustered as expected with the exception C. finlaysonianum and C. madidum, making it likely that the ndhJ-K-C region of these two species was from their plastome.

In contrast, the type II ndhK found in C. atropurpureum was in mitochondrial genome of C. lancifolium and C. macrorhizon, so it is likely that type II ndhJ-K-C region of C. atropurpureum was located in the chondriome. Considering the phylogenetic relationship between C. atropurpureum and C. macrorhizon [69, 72], the plastid ndhJ-K-C region might have been transferred to chondriome in the ancestor of Cymbidium. It also seems that the mt-ndhJ-K-C region of C. finlaysonianum and C. madidum was replaced with its plastid counterpart via recent homologous recombination. As a result, reimported plastid ndh genes are derived from the mt-ndh copies. The clustering of ndhG and ndhH among the two organellar genomes in some Cymbidium species also supports the hypothesis that their plastid ndh genes were relatively recently reimported from chondriome, probably via homologous recombination.

Materials and methods

DNA extraction, sequencing, annotation

Fresh leaves of C. finlaysonianum, C. devonianum and Grammatophyllum speciosum were collected from the orchid collection at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, and Ratcliffe Orchids, Ltd. (Hampshire, UK). Total DNA was extracted by the CTAB method [73]. Except for these three, all other genomic DNAs were taken from DNA Bank at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (Table 3; http://apps.kew.org/dnabank/introduction.html). Vouchers are deposited in the spirit collection at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

Table 3. PCR amplified ndh genes among 23 Cymbidium species including hybrids and three closely related taxa.

species	region	accession	species	region	accession
Acriopsis sp.	ndhB	KX962181	Cymbidium whiteae	ndhJKC	KX962256
Cymbidium atropurpureum	ndhB	KX962182	Grammatophyllum speciosum	ndhJKC	KX962257
Cymbidium bicolor	ndhB	KX962183	Thecostele secunda	ndhJKC	KX962258
Cymbidium dayanum	ndhB	KX962184	Cymbidium atropurpureum	ndhJKC TYEP I	KX962234
Cymbidium devonianum	ndhB	KX962185	Cymbidium atropurpureum	ndhJKC TYEP II	KX962233
Cymbidium eburneum	ndhB	KX962186	Acriopsis sp.	ndh genes in SSC region	KX962259
Cymbidium elegans	ndhB	KX962187	Cymbidium atropurpureum	ndh genes in SSC region	KX962260
Cymbidium erythraeum	ndhB	KX962188	Cymbidium bicolor	ndh genes in SSC region	KX962261
Cymbidium erythrostylum	ndhB	KX962189	Cymbidium dayanum	ndh genes in SSC region	KX962262
Cymbidium finlaysonianum	ndhB	KX962190	Cymbidium eburneum	ndh genes in SSC region	KX962263
Cymbidium floribundum	ndhB	KX962191	Cymbidium elegans	ndh genes in SSC region	KX962264
Cymbidium giganteum	ndhB	KX962192	Cymbidium erythraeum	ndh genes in SSC region	KX962265
Cymbidium goeringii	ndhB	KX962193	Cymbidium erythrostylum	ndh genes in SSC region	KX962266
Cymbidium hookerianum	ndhB	KX962194	Cymbidium finlaysonianum	ndh genes in SSC region	KX962267
Cymbidium insigne	ndhB	KX962195	Cymbidium floribundum	ndh genes in SSC region	KX962268
Cymbidium iridioides	ndhB	KX962196	Cymbidium giganteum	ndh genes in SSC region	KX962269
Cymbidium lowianum	ndhB	KX962197	Cymbidium goeringii	ndh genes in SSC region	KX962270
Cymbidium madidum	ndhB	KX962198	Cymbidium hookerianum	ndh genes in SSC region	KX962271
Cymbidium mastersii	ndhB	KX962199	Cymbidium insigne	ndh genes in SSC region	KX962272
Cymbidium pumilum	ndhB	KX962200	Cymbidium iridioides	ndh genes in SSC region	KX962273
Cymbidium sanderae	ndhB	KX962201	Cymbidium lowianum	ndh genes in SSC region	KX962274
Cymbidium suavissimum	ndhB	KX962202	Cymbidium madidum	ndh genes in SSC region	KX962275
Cymbidium tigrinum	ndhB	KX962203	Cymbidium mastersii	ndh genes in SSC region	KX962276
Cymbidium whiteae	ndhB	KX962204	Cymbidium pumilum	ndh genes in SSC region	KX962277
Grammatophyllum speciosum	ndhB	KX962205	Cymbidium sanderae	ndh genes in SSC region	KX962278
Thecostele secunda	ndhB	KX962206	Cymbidium suavissimum	ndh genes in SSC region	KX962279
Acriopsis sp.	ndhD	KX962207	Cymbidium tigrinum	ndh genes in SSC region	KX962280
Cymbidium atropurpureum	ndhD	KX962208	Cymbidium whiteae	ndh genes in SSC region	KX962281
Cymbidium bicolor	ndhD	KX962209	Grammatophyllum speciosum	ndh genes in SSC region	KX962282
Cymbidium dayanum	ndhD	KX962210	Thecostele secunda	ndh genes in SSC region	KX962283
Cymbidium eburneum	ndhD	KX962211	Cymbidium bicolor	ycf1-rpl32_tyep I	KY006886
Cymbidium elegans	ndhD	KX962212	Cymbidium dayanum	ycf1-rpl32_tyep I	KY006885
Cymbidium erythraeum	ndhD	KX962213	Cymbidium elegans	ycf1-rpl32_tyep I	KY006884
Cymbidium erythrostylum	ndhD	KX962214	Cymbidium erythraeum	ycf1-rpl32_tyep I	KY006878
Cymbidium finlaysonianum	ndhD	KX962215	Cymbidium giganteum	ycf1-rpl32_tyep I	KY006880
Cymbidium floribundum	ndhD	KX962216	Cymbidium insigne	ycf1-rpl32_tyep I	KY006881
Cymbidium giganteum	ndhD	KX962217	Cymbidium iridioides	ycf1-rpl32_tyep I	KY006883
Cymbidium goeringii	ndhD	KX962218	Cymbidium lowianum	ycf1-rpl32_tyep I	KY006882
Cymbidium hookerianum	ndhD	KX962219	Cymbidium mastersii	ycf1-rpl32_tyep I	KY006888
Cymbidium insigne	ndhD	KX962220	Cymbidium sanderae	ycf1-rpl32_tyep I	KY006879
Cymbidium iridioides	ndhD	KX962221	Grammatophyllum speciosum	ycf1-rpl32_tyep I	KY006887
Cymbidium lowianum	ndhD	KX962222	Cymbidium atropurpureum	ycf1-rpl32_tyep II	KY006898
Cymbidium madidum	ndhD	KX962223	Cymbidium ensifolium	ycf1-rpl32_tyep II	KY006890
Cymbidium mastersii	ndhD	KX962224	Cymbidium finlaysonianum	ycf1-rpl32_tyep II	KY006896
Cymbidium pumilum	ndhD	KX962225	Cymbidium floribundum	ycf1-rpl32_tyep II	KY006899
Cymbidium sanderae	ndhD	KX962226	Cymbidium hookerianum	ycf1-rpl32_tyep II	KY006892
Cymbidium suavissimum	ndhD	KX962227	Cymbidium kanran	ycf1-rpl32_tyep II	KY006897
Cymbidium tigrinum	ndhD	KX962228	Cymbidium lancifolium	ycf1-rpl32_tyep II	KY006889
Cymbidium whiteae	ndhD	KX962229	Cymbidium pumilum	ycf1-rpl32_tyep II	KY006894
Grammatophyllum speciosum	ndhD	KX962230	Cymbidium sinense	ycf1-rpl32_tyep II	KY006891
Thecostele secunda	ndhD	KX962231	Cymbidium suavissimum	ycf1-rpl32_tyep II	KY006893
Acriopsis sp.	ndhJKC	KX962232	Cymbidium tigrinum	ycf1-rpl32_tyep II	KY006895
Cymbidium bicolor	ndhJKC	KX962235	Acriopsis sp.	ycf1-rpl32_tyep III	KY006900
Cymbidium dayanum	ndhJKC	KX962236	Cymbidium madidum	ycf1-rpl32_tyep III	KY006901
Cymbidium devonianum	ndhJKC	KX962237	Thecostele secunda	ycf1-rpl32_tyep III	KY006902
Cymbidium eburneum	ndhJKC	KX962238	Acriopsis sp.	ycf1-rpl32_tyep IV	KY006918
Cymbidium elegans	ndhJKC	KX962239	Cymbidium bicolor	ycf1-rpl32_tyep IV	KY006905
Cymbidium erythraeum	ndhJKC	KX962240	Cymbidium devonianum	ycf1-rpl32_tyep IV	KY006913
Cymbidium erythrostylum	ndhJKC	KX962241	Cymbidium eburneum	ycf1-rpl32_tyep IV	KY006915
Cymbidium finlaysonianum	ndhJKC	KX962242	Cymbidium ensifolium	ycf1-rpl32_tyep IV	KY006904
Cymbidium floribundum	ndhJKC	KX962243	Cymbidium erythrostylum	ycf1-rpl32_tyep IV	KY006911
Cymbidium giganteum	ndhJKC	KX962244	Cymbidium floribundum	ycf1-rpl32_tyep IV	KY006908
Cymbidium goeringii	ndhJKC	KX962245	Cymbidium goeringii	ycf1-rpl32_tyep IV	KY006920
Cymbidium hookerianum	ndhJKC	KX962246	Cymbidium kanran	ycf1-rpl32_tyep IV	KY006907
Cymbidium insigne	ndhJKC	KX962247	Cymbidium lancifolium	ycf1-rpl32_tyep IV	KY006919
Cymbidium iridioides	ndhJKC	KX962248	Cymbidium lowianum	ycf1-rpl32_tyep IV	KY006909
Cymbidium lowianum	ndhJKC	KX962249	Cymbidium mastersii	ycf1-rpl32_tyep IV	KY006914
Cymbidium madidum	ndhJKC	KX962250	Cymbidium pumilum	ycf1-rpl32_tyep IV	KY006912
Cymbidium mastersii	ndhJKC	KX962251	Cymbidium sinense	ycf1-rpl32_tyep IV	KY006906
Cymbidium pumilum	ndhJKC	KX962252	Cymbidium tigrinum	ycf1-rpl32_tyep IV	KY006903
Cymbidium sanderae	ndhJKC	KX962253	Cymbidium whiteae	ycf1-rpl32_tyep IV	KY006917
Cymbidium suavissimum	ndhJKC	KX962254	Grammatophyllum speciosum	ycf1-rpl32_tyep IV	KY006910
Cymbidium tigrinum	ndhJKC	KX962255	Thecostele secunda	ycf1-rpl32_tyep IV	KY006916

Open in a new tab

Four regions including all 11 ndh genes (ndhB, ndhJ-K-C, ndhF, and ndhD-E-G-I-A-H) were assembled from the plastomes of Cymbidium [43]. Except for the ndhF region, primers were designed for three regions to sequence the full length of each region. In the ndhF region, there were a number of homopolymers near both ends. According to previous studies [43] and submitted sequences, this gene was completely deleted in some accessions of Cymbidium. Therefore, primers were designed just to confirm absence/presence of ndhF in each accession.

The four regions in each species sampled were amplified as follows: 95°C 5min, (95°C 30 sec—50~55°C 30sec– 65~72°C 2min) × 31 cycles, 65~72°C 2min using TaKaRa Premix Taq. PCR products were purified with Qiagen kits using the protocol of the manufacturer and were sequenced using Big-Dye chemistry on an ABI3730XL sequencer following the protocols of the manufacturer. All sequences were assembled by taxon and region using Geneious [74]. We annotated 11 ndh genes in each Cymbidium and three closely related taxa using complete sequenced plastome sequences in Orchidaceae.

Detecting ndh genes in chondriome

We used the data set from the Sequence Read Archive [75] and Cymbidium data generated by Kim (not published) to confirm if ndh genes had been translocated to the chondriome (Table 2). We slightly modified the assembly method of Kim et al. [30] (Fig 6). Read ends were trimmed with an error probability limit of 0.01, and then reads under 40 bp and their counterpart reads were removed from data set. Each data set was aligned to the chondriome sequence of Phoenix dactylifera [65] under the medium sensitivity option in Geneious [74]. Then, the reads assembled with the reference were extracted and re-assembled using de novo assembly in Geneious with zero mismatch and gaps [74]. Several contigs were generated, and reads were re-aligned to them with zero mismatch and gaps with 25 iterations. We generated consensus contigs and aligned them by de novo assembly. The resulting contigs were re-used as reference sequences.

Whenever this process was repeated, the number of contigs was reduced, and lengths of resulting contigs extended, and this cycle was repeated until the contigs produced were not extended. To prevent misassembled contigs, only paired reads that matched and upstream or downstream sequence were used throughout the assembly process.

All contigs were investigated for similarity to chondriome sequences using BLAST [76]. Thereafter, mitochondrial contigs were annotated in comparison with their own plastomes. To distinguish the location of genes, genes in the plastome are prefixed with pt- and those in chondriome are prefixed with mt-. Information on mt-ndh genes is described in Table 2.

Phylogenetic analysis of ndh genes in both organellar genomes in Orchidaceae

The pt- and mt-ndh genes in Cymbidium and three closely related taxa were sequenced in this paper. In addition, 55 plastomes (S2 Table) and 38 chondriome sequences (S3 Table) were downloaded from NCBI. The three Phalaenopsis plastomes and Vanilla planifolia have a 76 ~ 83 bp inversion upstream of the 3′ end of ndhB. Each ndh gene set was aligned via MAFFT alignment [77].

The ndhF gene was excluded from phylogenetic analysis because many species contained two types of ndhF genes, and it was difficult to determine where they were located in the organellar genomes. Introns in ndhA and ndhB were also removed from data set. The best-fit substitution model for each data set was determined using jModeltest2 [78]. Bayesian analysis was performed using mrbayes 3.2.3 [79] as implemented in the CIPRES SCIENCE Gateway [80], under GTR + G model (ngen = 10000000, samplefreq = 1000, burninfrac = 0.25).

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Alignment of ndh genes of 23 Cymbidium species and three closely related genera.

Masdevallia coccinea ndh genes were used as reference. A) ndhB region. B) ndhJ-K-C region. Grey and black in the alignment indicate agreement and disagreement with the consensus sequence, respectively. Red in the alignment indicates ambiguous sites. Black bars at the bottom of the alignment indicate coding regions. Blue arrows and numbers at the bottom of the alignment indicate direct repeat sequences and length of repeat sequence, respectively.

(EPS)

Click here for additional data file.^{(5MB, eps)}

S2 Fig. Alignment of ndh genes of 23 Cymbidium species and three closely related genera.

Masdevallia coccinea ndh genes were used as reference. A) ndhD region. B) ndhE-G-I-A-H region Grey and black in the alignment indicate agreement and disagreement to consensus sequence, respectively. Red in the alignment indicates ambiguous sites. Black bars at the bottom of the alignment indicate coding regions. Blue arrows and numbers at the bottom of the alignment indicate direct repeat sequences and length of repeat sequence, respectively. Vertical red dotted lines indicate the end point of deletions. Green and blue lines at the bottom indicate AT- and GC-content of C. elegans.

(EPS)

Click here for additional data file.^{(8.1MB, eps)}

S3 Fig. Ten gene trees produced by the Bayesian analysis.

(EPS)

Click here for additional data file.^{(5.6MB, eps)}

S4 Fig. Gene conversion in the plastid ndhF gene.

(EPS)

Click here for additional data file.^{(3MB, eps)}

S1 Table. The ndh status of 743 plastomes.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.^{(121.3KB, docx)}

S2 Table. The 55 plastome sequences for phylogenetic study of ndh genes.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.^{(17.9KB, docx)}

S3 Table. The mt-ndh genes for phylogenetic study of ndh genes.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.^{(22.8KB, docx)}

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2015R1A6A3A03020621).

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Data Availability

All sequence data are available from GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/). All relevant accession numbers are included within the paper and its Supporting Information tables.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2015R1A6A3A03020621).

References

1.Shinozaki K, Ohme M, Tanaka M, Wakasugi T, Hayashida N, Matsubayashi T, et al. The complete nucleotide sequence of the tobacco chloroplast genome: its gene organization and expression. EMBO J. 1986;5(9):2043–2049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Ohyama K, Fukuzawa H, Kohchi T, Shirai H, Sano T, Sano S, et al. Chloroplast gene organization deduced from complete sequence of liverwort Marchantia polymorpha chloroplast DNA. Nature. 1986;322(6079):572–574. doi: 10.1038/322572a0 [Google Scholar]
3.Sazanov LA, Burrows PA, Nixon PJ. The plastid ndh genes code for an NADH-specific dehydrogenase: isolation of a complex I analogue from pea thylakoid membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(3):1319–1324. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.3.1319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4.Burrows PA, Sazanov LA, Svab Z, Maliga P, Nixon PJ. Identification of a functional respiratory complex in chloroplasts through analysis of tobacco mutants containing disrupted plastid ndh genes. EMBO J. 1998;17(4):868–876. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.4.868 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Bendall DS, Manasse RS. Cyclic photophosphorylation and electron transport. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1995;1229(1):23–38. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(94)00195-b [Google Scholar]
6.Yamori W, Shikanai T, Makino A. Photosystem I cyclic electron flow via chloroplast NADH dehydrogenase-like complex performs a physiological role for photosynthesis at low light. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13908 doi: 10.1038/srep13908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Ueda M, Kuniyoshi T, Yamamoto H, Sugimoto K, Ishizaki K, Kohchi T, et al. Composition and physiological function of the chloroplast NADH dehydrogenase-like complex in Marchantia polymorpha. Plant J. 2012;72(4):683–693. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05115.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.Munekage Y, Hojo M, Meurer J, Endo T, Tasaka M, Shikanai T. PGR5 is involved in cyclic electron flow around photosystem I and is essential for photoprotection in Arabidopsis. Cell. 2002;110(3):361–371. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00867-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Lin CS, Chen JJ, Huang YT, Chan MT, Daniell H, Chang WJ, et al. The location and translocation of ndh genes of chloroplast origin in the Orchidaceae family. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9040 doi: 10.1038/srep09040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Wakasugi T, Tsudzuki J, Ito S, Nakashima K, Tsudzuki T, Sugiura M. Loss of all ndh genes as determined by sequencing the entire chloroplast genome of the black pine Pinus thunbergii. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91(21):9794–9798. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.21.9794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.Neyland R, Urbatsch LE. The ndhF chloroplast gene detected in all vascular plant divisions. Planta. 1996;200(2):273–277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Wickett NJ, Zhang Y, Hansen SK, Roper JM, Kuehl JV, Plock SA, et al. Functional gene losses occur with minimal size reduction in the plastid genome of the parasitic liverwort Aneura mirabilis. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25(2):393–401. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.Forrest LL. Deep sequencing of Ptilidium(Ptilidiaceae) suggests evolutionary stasis in liverwort plastid genome structure. Plant Ecol Evol. 2011;144(1):29–43. doi: 10.5091/plecevo.2011.535 [Google Scholar]
14.Kim HT, Chung MG, Kim KJ. Chloroplast genome evolution in early diverged leptosporangiate ferns. Mol Cells. 2014;37(5):372–382. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2014.2296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Gao L, Yi X, Yang YX, Su YJ, Wang T. Complete chloroplast genome sequence of a tree fern Alsophila spinulosa: insights into evolutionary changes in fern chloroplast genomes. BMC Evol Biol. 2009;9:130 doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16.Wolf PG, Rowe CA, Sinclair RB, Hasebe M. Complete nucleotide sequence of the chloroplast genome from a leptosporangiate fern, Adiantum capillus-veneris L. DNA Res. 2003;10(2):59–65. doi: 10.1093/dnares/10.2.59 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.Wu CS, Lin CP, Hsu CY, Wang RJ, Chaw SM. Comparative chloroplast genomes of Pinaceae: insights into the mechanism of diversified genomic organizations. Genome Biol Evol. 2011;3:309–319. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evr026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.Lin CP, Huang JP, Wu CS, Hsu CY, Chaw SM. Comparative chloroplast genomics reveals the evolution of Pinaceae genera and subfamilies. Genome Biol Evol. 2010;2:504–517. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evq036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19.Nystedt B, Street NR, Wetterbom A, Zuccolo A, Lin YC, Scofield DG, et al. The Norway spruce genome sequence and conifer genome evolution. Nature. 2013;497(7451):579–584. doi: 10.1038/nature12211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20.McCoy SR, Kuehl JV, Boore JL, Raubeson LA. The complete plastid genome sequence of Welwitschia mirabilis: an unusually compact plastome with accelerated divergence rates. BMC Evol Biol. 2008;8:130 doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21.Wu CS, Lai YT, Lin CP, Wang YN, Chaw SM. Evolution of reduced and compact chloroplast genomes (cpDNAs) in gnetophytes: selection toward a lower-cost strategy. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009;52(1):115–124. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.12.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22.dePamphilis CW, Palmer JD. Loss of photosynthetic and chlororespiratory genes from the plastid genome of a parasitic flowering plant. Nature. 1990;348(6299):337–339. doi: 10.1038/348337a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.Haberhausen G, Zetsche K. Functional loss of all ndh genes in an otherwise relatively unaltered plastid genome of the holoparasitic flowering plant Cuscuta reflexa. Plant Mol Biol. 1994;24(1):217–222. doi: 10.1007/bf00040588 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24.McNeal JR, Kuehl JV, Boore JL, de Pamphilis CW. Complete plastid genome sequences suggest strong selection for retention of photosynthetic genes in the parasitic plant genus Cuscuta. BMC Plant Biol. 2007;7:57 doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-7-57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25.Logacheva MD, Schelkunov MI, Nuraliev MS, Samigullin TH, Penin AA. The plastid genome of mycoheterotrophic monocot Petrosavia stellaris exhibits both gene losses and multiple rearrangements. Genome Biol Evol. 2014;6(1):238–246. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26.Peredo EL, King UM, Les DH. The plastid genome of Najas flexilis: adaptation to submersed environments is accompanied by the complete loss of the NDH complex in an aquatic angiosperm. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e68591 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27.Guisinger MM, Kuehl JV, Boore JL, Jansen RK. Extreme reconfiguration of plastid genomes in the angiosperm family Geraniaceae: rearrangements, repeats, and codon usage. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28(1):583–600. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28.Chris Blazier J, Guisinger MM, Jansen RK. Recent loss of plastid-encoded ndh genes within Erodium (Geraniaceae). Plant Mol Biol. 2011;76(3–5):263–272. doi: 10.1007/s11103-011-9753-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29.Sanderson MJ, Copetti D, Burquez A, Bustamante E, Charboneau JL, Eguiarte LE, et al. Exceptional reduction of the plastid genome of saguaro cactus (Carnegiea gigantea): Loss of the ndh gene suite and inverted repeat. Am J Bot. 2015;102(7):1115–1127. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1500184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30.Kim HT, Kim JS, Moore MJ, Neubig KM, Williams NH, Whitten WM, et al. Seven new complete plastome sequences reveal rampant independent loss of the ndh gene family across orchids and associated instability of the inverted repeat/small single-copy region boundaries. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0142215 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31.Weng ML, Blazier JC, Govindu M, Jansen RK. Reconstruction of the ancestral plastid genome in Geraniaceae reveals a correlation between genome rearrangements, repeats, and nucleotide substitution rates. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;31(3):645–659. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32.Kim KA, Cheon KS, Jang SK, Yoo KO. Complete chloroplast genome sequence of Adenophora remotiflora (Campanulaceae). Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 2016;27(4):2963–2964. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2015.1060461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33.Kumar S, Hahn FM, McMahan CM, Cornish K, Whalen MC. Comparative analysis of the complete sequence of the plastid genome of Parthenium argentatum and identification of DNA barcodes to differentiate Parthenium species and lines. BMC Plant Biol. 2009;9(1):131 doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-9-131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34.Li X, Zhang TC, Qiao Q, Ren Z, Zhao J, Yonezawa T, et al. Complete chloroplast genome sequence of holoparasite Cistanche deserticola (Orobanchaceae) reveals gene loss and horizontal gene transfer from its host Haloxylon ammodendron (Chenopodiaceae). PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58747 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35.Wicke S, Muller KF, de Pamphilis CW, Quandt D, Wickett NJ, Zhang Y, et al. Mechanisms of functional and physical genome reduction in photosynthetic and nonphotosynthetic parasitic plants of the broomrape family. Plant Cell. 2013;25(10):3711–3725. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.113373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36.Wolfe KH, Morden CW, Ems SC, Palmer JD. Rapid evolution of the plastid translational apparatus in a nonphotosynthetic plant: loss or accelerated sequence evolution of tRNA and ribosomal protein genes. J Mol Evol. 1992;35(4):304–317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37.Funk HT, Berg S, Krupinska K, Maier UG, Krause K. Complete DNA sequences of the plastid genomes of two parasitic flowering plant species, Cuscuta reflexa and Cuscuta gronovii. BMC Plant Biol. 2007;7:45 doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-7-45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38.Kim JS, Kim HT, Kim J-H. The largest plastid genome of monocots: a novel genome type containing AT residue repeats in the slipper orchid Cypripedium japonicum. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2014;33(5):1210–1220. doi: 10.1007/s11105-014-0833-y [Google Scholar]
39.Chang CC, Lin HC, Lin IP, Chow TY, Chen HH, Chen WH, et al. The chloroplast genome of Phalaenopsis aphrodite (Orchidaceae): comparative analysis of evolutionary rate with that of grasses and its phylogenetic implications. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;23(2):279–291. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msj029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40.Wu FH, Chan MT, Liao DC, Hsu CT, Lee YW, Daniell H, et al. Complete chloroplast genome of Oncidium Gower Ramsey and evaluation of molecular markers for identification and breeding in Oncidiinae. BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10:68 doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-68 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41.Jheng CF, Chen TC, Lin JY, Chen TC, Wu WL, Chang CC. The comparative chloroplast genomic analysis of photosynthetic orchids and developing DNA markers to distinguish Phalaenopsis orchids. Plant Sci. 2012;190:62–73. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42.Pan IC, Liao DC, Wu FH, Daniell H, Singh ND, Chang C, et al. Complete chloroplast genome sequence of an orchid model plant candidate: Erycina pusilla apply in tropical Oncidium breeding. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34738 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43.Yang JB, Tang M, Li HT, Zhang ZR, Li DZ. Complete chloroplast genome of the genus Cymbidium: lights into the species identification, phylogenetic implications and population genetic analyses. BMC Evol Biol. 2013;13:84 doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-84 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44.Luo J, Hou BW, Niu ZT, Liu W, Xue QY, Ding XY. Comparative chloroplast genomes of photosynthetic orchids: insights into evolution of the Orchidaceae and development of molecular markers for phylogenetic applications. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99016 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45.Delannoy E, Fujii S, Colas des Francs-Small C, Brundrett M, Small I. Rampant gene loss in the underground orchid Rhizanthella gardneri highlights evolutionary constraints on plastid genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28(7):2077–2086. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46.Logacheva MD, Schelkunov MI, Penin AA. Sequencing and analysis of plastid genome in mycoheterotrophic orchid Neottia nidus-avis. Genome Biol Evol. 2011;3:1296–1303. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evr102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47.Barrett CF, Davis JI. The plastid genome of the mycoheterotrophic Corallorhiza striata (Orchidaceae) is in the relatively early stages of degradation. Am J Bot. 2012;99(9):1513–1523. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1200256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48.Barrett CF, Freudenstein JV, Li J, Mayfield-Jones DR, Perez L, Pires JC, et al. Investigating the path of plastid genome degradation in an early-transitional clade of heterotrophic orchids, and implications for heterotrophic angiosperms. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;31(12):3095–3112. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu252 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49.Schelkunov MI, Shtratnikova VY, Nuraliev MS, Selosse MA, Penin AA, Logacheva MD. Exploring the limits for reduction of plastid genomes: a case study of the mycoheterotrophic orchids Epipogium aphyllum and Epipogium roseum. Genome Biol Evol. 2015;7(4):1179–1191. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evv019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50.Du Puy D, Cribb P. The genus Cymbidium: Christopher Helm: Portland, Oregon.: London: & Timber Press; 1988. [Google Scholar]
51.Chase MW, Cameron KM, Freudenstein JV, Pridgeon AM, Salazar G, van den Berg C, et al. An updated classification of Orchidaceae. Bot J Linn Soc. 2015;177(2):151–174. doi: 10.1111/boj.12234 [Google Scholar]
52.Palmer JD, Herbon LA. Plant mitochondrial DNA evolved rapidly in structure, but slowly in sequence. J Mol Evol. 1988;28(1–2):87–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53.Yang P, Zhou H, Qian J, Xu H, Shao Q, Li Y, et al. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Dendrobium officinale. Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 2016;27(2):1262–1264. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2014.945547 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54.Ruhlman TA, Jansen RK. The plastid genomes of flowering plants. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1132:3–38. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-995-6_1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
55.Wang S, Shi C, Gao LZ. Plastid genome sequence of a wild woody oil species, Prinsepia utilis, provides insights into evolutionary and mutational patterns of Rosaceae chloroplast genomes. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e73946 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073946 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
56.Yi DK, Kim KJ. Complete chloroplast genome sequences of important oilseed crop Sesamum indicum L. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e35872 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035872 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
57.Xu Q, Xiong G, Li P, He F, Huang Y, Wang K, et al. Analysis of complete nucleotide sequences of 12 Gossypium chloroplast genomes: origin and evolution of allotetraploids. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e37128 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
58.Palmer JD. Plastid chromosomes: structure and evolution. The molecular biology of plastids. 1991;7:5–53. [Google Scholar]
59.Matsuoka Y, Yamazaki Y, Ogihara Y, Tsunewaki K. Whole chloroplast genome comparison of rice, maize, and wheat: implications for chloroplast gene diversification and phylogeny of cereals. Mol Biol Evol. 2002;19(12):2084–2091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
60.Ogihara Y, Terachi T, Sasakuma T. Intramolecular recombination of chloroplast genome mediated by short direct-repeat sequences in wheat species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85(22):8573–8577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
61.Aldrich J, Cherney BW, Merlin E. The role of insertions/deletions in the evolution of the intergenic region between psbA and trnH in the chloroplast genome. Curr Genet. 1988;14(2):137–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
62.Muller AE, Kamisugi Y, Gruneberg R, Niedenhof I, Horold RJ, Meyer P. Palindromic sequences and A+T-rich DNA elements promote illegitimate recombination in Nicotiana tabacum. J Mol Biol. 1999;291(1):29–46. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2957 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
63.Goulding SE, Olmstead RG, Morden CW, Wolfe KH. Ebb and flow of the chloroplast inverted repeat. Mol Gen Genet. 1996;252(1–2):195–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
64.Cai J, Liu X, Vanneste K, Proost S, Tsai WC, Liu KW, et al. The genome sequence of the orchid Phalaenopsis equestris. Nat Genet. 2015;47(1):65–72. doi: 10.1038/ng.3149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
65.Fang Y, Wu H, Zhang T, Yang M, Yin Y, Pan L, et al. A complete sequence and transcriptomic analyses of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) mitochondrial genome. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37164 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
66.Rodriguez-Moreno L, Gonzalez VM, Benjak A, Marti MC, Puigdomenech P, Aranda MA, et al. Determination of the melon chloroplast and mitochondrial genome sequences reveals that the largest reported mitochondrial genome in plants contains a significant amount of DNA having a nuclear origin. BMC Genomics. 2011;12(1):424 doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
67.Alverson AJ, Wei X, Rice DW, Stern DB, Barry K, Palmer JD. Insights into the evolution of mitochondrial genome size from complete sequences of Citrullus lanatus and Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27(6):1436–1448. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
68.Wang D, Wu YW, Shih AC, Wu CS, Wang YN, Chaw SM. Transfer of chloroplast genomic DNA to mitochondrial genome occurred at least 300 MYA. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24(9):2040–2048. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
69.Yukawa T, Miyoshi K, Yokoyama J. Molecular phylogeny and character evolution of Cymbidium (Orchidaceae). Bull Nation Sci Mus, B (Tokyo). 2002;28(4):129–139. [Google Scholar]
70.Gustafsson AL, Verola CF, Antonelli A. Reassessing the temporal evolution of orchids with new fossils and a Bayesian relaxed clock, with implications for the diversification of the rare South American genus Hoffmannseggella (Orchidaceae: Epidendroideae). BMC Evol Biol. 2010;10:177 doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
71.Park S, Grewe F, Zhu A, Ruhlman TA, Sabir J, Mower JP, et al. Dynamic evolution of Geranium mitochondrial genomes through multiple horizontal and intracellular gene transfers. New Phytol. 2015;208(2):570–583. doi: 10.1111/nph.13467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
72.van den Berg C, Ryan A, Cribb PJ, Chase MW. Molecular phylogenetics of Cymbidium (Orchidaceae: Maxillarieae): Sequence data from internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA and plastid matK. Lindleyana. 2002;17(2):102–111. [Google Scholar]
73.Doyle JJ. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem bull. 1987;19:11–15. [Google Scholar]
74.Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, et al. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(12):1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
75.Leinonen R, Sugawara H, Shumway M, International Nucleotide Sequence Database C. The sequence read archive. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(Database issue):D19–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
76.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215(3):403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
77.Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(14):3059–3066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
78.Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods. 2012;9(8):772 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
79.Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Hohna S, et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 2012;61(3):539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
80.Miller M, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T, editors. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 2010; 2010: IEEE.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Fig. Alignment of ndh genes of 23 Cymbidium species and three closely related genera.

(EPS)

Click here for additional data file.^{(5MB, eps)}

S2 Fig. Alignment of ndh genes of 23 Cymbidium species and three closely related genera.

(EPS)

Click here for additional data file.^{(8.1MB, eps)}

S3 Fig. Ten gene trees produced by the Bayesian analysis.

(EPS)

Click here for additional data file.^{(5.6MB, eps)}

S4 Fig. Gene conversion in the plastid ndhF gene.

(EPS)

Click here for additional data file.^{(3MB, eps)}

S1 Table. The ndh status of 743 plastomes.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.^{(121.3KB, docx)}

S2 Table. The 55 plastome sequences for phylogenetic study of ndh genes.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.^{(17.9KB, docx)}

S3 Table. The mt-ndh genes for phylogenetic study of ndh genes.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.^{(22.8KB, docx)}

Data Availability Statement

All sequence data are available from GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/). All relevant accession numbers are included within the paper and its Supporting Information tables.

[pone.0187318.ref001] 1.Shinozaki K, Ohme M, Tanaka M, Wakasugi T, Hayashida N, Matsubayashi T, et al. The complete nucleotide sequence of the tobacco chloroplast genome: its gene organization and expression. EMBO J. 1986;5(9):2043–2049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref002] 2.Ohyama K, Fukuzawa H, Kohchi T, Shirai H, Sano T, Sano S, et al. Chloroplast gene organization deduced from complete sequence of liverwort Marchantia polymorpha chloroplast DNA. Nature. 1986;322(6079):572–574. doi: 10.1038/322572a0 [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref003] 3.Sazanov LA, Burrows PA, Nixon PJ. The plastid ndh genes code for an NADH-specific dehydrogenase: isolation of a complex I analogue from pea thylakoid membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(3):1319–1324. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.3.1319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref004] 4.Burrows PA, Sazanov LA, Svab Z, Maliga P, Nixon PJ. Identification of a functional respiratory complex in chloroplasts through analysis of tobacco mutants containing disrupted plastid ndh genes. EMBO J. 1998;17(4):868–876. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.4.868 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref005] 5.Bendall DS, Manasse RS. Cyclic photophosphorylation and electron transport. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1995;1229(1):23–38. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(94)00195-b [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref006] 6.Yamori W, Shikanai T, Makino A. Photosystem I cyclic electron flow via chloroplast NADH dehydrogenase-like complex performs a physiological role for photosynthesis at low light. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13908 doi: 10.1038/srep13908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref007] 7.Ueda M, Kuniyoshi T, Yamamoto H, Sugimoto K, Ishizaki K, Kohchi T, et al. Composition and physiological function of the chloroplast NADH dehydrogenase-like complex in Marchantia polymorpha. Plant J. 2012;72(4):683–693. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.05115.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref008] 8.Munekage Y, Hojo M, Meurer J, Endo T, Tasaka M, Shikanai T. PGR5 is involved in cyclic electron flow around photosystem I and is essential for photoprotection in Arabidopsis. Cell. 2002;110(3):361–371. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00867-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref009] 9.Lin CS, Chen JJ, Huang YT, Chan MT, Daniell H, Chang WJ, et al. The location and translocation of ndh genes of chloroplast origin in the Orchidaceae family. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9040 doi: 10.1038/srep09040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref010] 10.Wakasugi T, Tsudzuki J, Ito S, Nakashima K, Tsudzuki T, Sugiura M. Loss of all ndh genes as determined by sequencing the entire chloroplast genome of the black pine Pinus thunbergii. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91(21):9794–9798. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.21.9794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref011] 11.Neyland R, Urbatsch LE. The ndhF chloroplast gene detected in all vascular plant divisions. Planta. 1996;200(2):273–277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref012] 12.Wickett NJ, Zhang Y, Hansen SK, Roper JM, Kuehl JV, Plock SA, et al. Functional gene losses occur with minimal size reduction in the plastid genome of the parasitic liverwort Aneura mirabilis. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25(2):393–401. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref013] 13.Forrest LL. Deep sequencing of Ptilidium(Ptilidiaceae) suggests evolutionary stasis in liverwort plastid genome structure. Plant Ecol Evol. 2011;144(1):29–43. doi: 10.5091/plecevo.2011.535 [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref014] 14.Kim HT, Chung MG, Kim KJ. Chloroplast genome evolution in early diverged leptosporangiate ferns. Mol Cells. 2014;37(5):372–382. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2014.2296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref015] 15.Gao L, Yi X, Yang YX, Su YJ, Wang T. Complete chloroplast genome sequence of a tree fern Alsophila spinulosa: insights into evolutionary changes in fern chloroplast genomes. BMC Evol Biol. 2009;9:130 doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref016] 16.Wolf PG, Rowe CA, Sinclair RB, Hasebe M. Complete nucleotide sequence of the chloroplast genome from a leptosporangiate fern, Adiantum capillus-veneris L. DNA Res. 2003;10(2):59–65. doi: 10.1093/dnares/10.2.59 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref017] 17.Wu CS, Lin CP, Hsu CY, Wang RJ, Chaw SM. Comparative chloroplast genomes of Pinaceae: insights into the mechanism of diversified genomic organizations. Genome Biol Evol. 2011;3:309–319. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evr026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref018] 18.Lin CP, Huang JP, Wu CS, Hsu CY, Chaw SM. Comparative chloroplast genomics reveals the evolution of Pinaceae genera and subfamilies. Genome Biol Evol. 2010;2:504–517. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evq036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref019] 19.Nystedt B, Street NR, Wetterbom A, Zuccolo A, Lin YC, Scofield DG, et al. The Norway spruce genome sequence and conifer genome evolution. Nature. 2013;497(7451):579–584. doi: 10.1038/nature12211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref020] 20.McCoy SR, Kuehl JV, Boore JL, Raubeson LA. The complete plastid genome sequence of Welwitschia mirabilis: an unusually compact plastome with accelerated divergence rates. BMC Evol Biol. 2008;8:130 doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref021] 21.Wu CS, Lai YT, Lin CP, Wang YN, Chaw SM. Evolution of reduced and compact chloroplast genomes (cpDNAs) in gnetophytes: selection toward a lower-cost strategy. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009;52(1):115–124. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2008.12.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref022] 22.dePamphilis CW, Palmer JD. Loss of photosynthetic and chlororespiratory genes from the plastid genome of a parasitic flowering plant. Nature. 1990;348(6299):337–339. doi: 10.1038/348337a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref023] 23.Haberhausen G, Zetsche K. Functional loss of all ndh genes in an otherwise relatively unaltered plastid genome of the holoparasitic flowering plant Cuscuta reflexa. Plant Mol Biol. 1994;24(1):217–222. doi: 10.1007/bf00040588 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref024] 24.McNeal JR, Kuehl JV, Boore JL, de Pamphilis CW. Complete plastid genome sequences suggest strong selection for retention of photosynthetic genes in the parasitic plant genus Cuscuta. BMC Plant Biol. 2007;7:57 doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-7-57 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref025] 25.Logacheva MD, Schelkunov MI, Nuraliev MS, Samigullin TH, Penin AA. The plastid genome of mycoheterotrophic monocot Petrosavia stellaris exhibits both gene losses and multiple rearrangements. Genome Biol Evol. 2014;6(1):238–246. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref026] 26.Peredo EL, King UM, Les DH. The plastid genome of Najas flexilis: adaptation to submersed environments is accompanied by the complete loss of the NDH complex in an aquatic angiosperm. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e68591 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref027] 27.Guisinger MM, Kuehl JV, Boore JL, Jansen RK. Extreme reconfiguration of plastid genomes in the angiosperm family Geraniaceae: rearrangements, repeats, and codon usage. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28(1):583–600. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref028] 28.Chris Blazier J, Guisinger MM, Jansen RK. Recent loss of plastid-encoded ndh genes within Erodium (Geraniaceae). Plant Mol Biol. 2011;76(3–5):263–272. doi: 10.1007/s11103-011-9753-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref029] 29.Sanderson MJ, Copetti D, Burquez A, Bustamante E, Charboneau JL, Eguiarte LE, et al. Exceptional reduction of the plastid genome of saguaro cactus (Carnegiea gigantea): Loss of the ndh gene suite and inverted repeat. Am J Bot. 2015;102(7):1115–1127. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1500184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref030] 30.Kim HT, Kim JS, Moore MJ, Neubig KM, Williams NH, Whitten WM, et al. Seven new complete plastome sequences reveal rampant independent loss of the ndh gene family across orchids and associated instability of the inverted repeat/small single-copy region boundaries. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0142215 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref031] 31.Weng ML, Blazier JC, Govindu M, Jansen RK. Reconstruction of the ancestral plastid genome in Geraniaceae reveals a correlation between genome rearrangements, repeats, and nucleotide substitution rates. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;31(3):645–659. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref032] 32.Kim KA, Cheon KS, Jang SK, Yoo KO. Complete chloroplast genome sequence of Adenophora remotiflora (Campanulaceae). Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 2016;27(4):2963–2964. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2015.1060461 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref033] 33.Kumar S, Hahn FM, McMahan CM, Cornish K, Whalen MC. Comparative analysis of the complete sequence of the plastid genome of Parthenium argentatum and identification of DNA barcodes to differentiate Parthenium species and lines. BMC Plant Biol. 2009;9(1):131 doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-9-131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref034] 34.Li X, Zhang TC, Qiao Q, Ren Z, Zhao J, Yonezawa T, et al. Complete chloroplast genome sequence of holoparasite Cistanche deserticola (Orobanchaceae) reveals gene loss and horizontal gene transfer from its host Haloxylon ammodendron (Chenopodiaceae). PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58747 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref035] 35.Wicke S, Muller KF, de Pamphilis CW, Quandt D, Wickett NJ, Zhang Y, et al. Mechanisms of functional and physical genome reduction in photosynthetic and nonphotosynthetic parasitic plants of the broomrape family. Plant Cell. 2013;25(10):3711–3725. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.113373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref036] 36.Wolfe KH, Morden CW, Ems SC, Palmer JD. Rapid evolution of the plastid translational apparatus in a nonphotosynthetic plant: loss or accelerated sequence evolution of tRNA and ribosomal protein genes. J Mol Evol. 1992;35(4):304–317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref037] 37.Funk HT, Berg S, Krupinska K, Maier UG, Krause K. Complete DNA sequences of the plastid genomes of two parasitic flowering plant species, Cuscuta reflexa and Cuscuta gronovii. BMC Plant Biol. 2007;7:45 doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-7-45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref038] 38.Kim JS, Kim HT, Kim J-H. The largest plastid genome of monocots: a novel genome type containing AT residue repeats in the slipper orchid Cypripedium japonicum. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2014;33(5):1210–1220. doi: 10.1007/s11105-014-0833-y [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref039] 39.Chang CC, Lin HC, Lin IP, Chow TY, Chen HH, Chen WH, et al. The chloroplast genome of Phalaenopsis aphrodite (Orchidaceae): comparative analysis of evolutionary rate with that of grasses and its phylogenetic implications. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;23(2):279–291. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msj029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref040] 40.Wu FH, Chan MT, Liao DC, Hsu CT, Lee YW, Daniell H, et al. Complete chloroplast genome of Oncidium Gower Ramsey and evaluation of molecular markers for identification and breeding in Oncidiinae. BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10:68 doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-68 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref041] 41.Jheng CF, Chen TC, Lin JY, Chen TC, Wu WL, Chang CC. The comparative chloroplast genomic analysis of photosynthetic orchids and developing DNA markers to distinguish Phalaenopsis orchids. Plant Sci. 2012;190:62–73. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref042] 42.Pan IC, Liao DC, Wu FH, Daniell H, Singh ND, Chang C, et al. Complete chloroplast genome sequence of an orchid model plant candidate: Erycina pusilla apply in tropical Oncidium breeding. PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34738 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref043] 43.Yang JB, Tang M, Li HT, Zhang ZR, Li DZ. Complete chloroplast genome of the genus Cymbidium: lights into the species identification, phylogenetic implications and population genetic analyses. BMC Evol Biol. 2013;13:84 doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-84 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref044] 44.Luo J, Hou BW, Niu ZT, Liu W, Xue QY, Ding XY. Comparative chloroplast genomes of photosynthetic orchids: insights into evolution of the Orchidaceae and development of molecular markers for phylogenetic applications. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99016 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref045] 45.Delannoy E, Fujii S, Colas des Francs-Small C, Brundrett M, Small I. Rampant gene loss in the underground orchid Rhizanthella gardneri highlights evolutionary constraints on plastid genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28(7):2077–2086. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref046] 46.Logacheva MD, Schelkunov MI, Penin AA. Sequencing and analysis of plastid genome in mycoheterotrophic orchid Neottia nidus-avis. Genome Biol Evol. 2011;3:1296–1303. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evr102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref047] 47.Barrett CF, Davis JI. The plastid genome of the mycoheterotrophic Corallorhiza striata (Orchidaceae) is in the relatively early stages of degradation. Am J Bot. 2012;99(9):1513–1523. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1200256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref048] 48.Barrett CF, Freudenstein JV, Li J, Mayfield-Jones DR, Perez L, Pires JC, et al. Investigating the path of plastid genome degradation in an early-transitional clade of heterotrophic orchids, and implications for heterotrophic angiosperms. Mol Biol Evol. 2014;31(12):3095–3112. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu252 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref049] 49.Schelkunov MI, Shtratnikova VY, Nuraliev MS, Selosse MA, Penin AA, Logacheva MD. Exploring the limits for reduction of plastid genomes: a case study of the mycoheterotrophic orchids Epipogium aphyllum and Epipogium roseum. Genome Biol Evol. 2015;7(4):1179–1191. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evv019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref050] 50.Du Puy D, Cribb P. The genus Cymbidium: Christopher Helm: Portland, Oregon.: London: & Timber Press; 1988. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref051] 51.Chase MW, Cameron KM, Freudenstein JV, Pridgeon AM, Salazar G, van den Berg C, et al. An updated classification of Orchidaceae. Bot J Linn Soc. 2015;177(2):151–174. doi: 10.1111/boj.12234 [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref052] 52.Palmer JD, Herbon LA. Plant mitochondrial DNA evolved rapidly in structure, but slowly in sequence. J Mol Evol. 1988;28(1–2):87–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref053] 53.Yang P, Zhou H, Qian J, Xu H, Shao Q, Li Y, et al. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Dendrobium officinale. Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 2016;27(2):1262–1264. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2014.945547 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref054] 54.Ruhlman TA, Jansen RK. The plastid genomes of flowering plants. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1132:3–38. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-995-6_1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref055] 55.Wang S, Shi C, Gao LZ. Plastid genome sequence of a wild woody oil species, Prinsepia utilis, provides insights into evolutionary and mutational patterns of Rosaceae chloroplast genomes. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e73946 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073946 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref056] 56.Yi DK, Kim KJ. Complete chloroplast genome sequences of important oilseed crop Sesamum indicum L. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e35872 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035872 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref057] 57.Xu Q, Xiong G, Li P, He F, Huang Y, Wang K, et al. Analysis of complete nucleotide sequences of 12 Gossypium chloroplast genomes: origin and evolution of allotetraploids. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e37128 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref058] 58.Palmer JD. Plastid chromosomes: structure and evolution. The molecular biology of plastids. 1991;7:5–53. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref059] 59.Matsuoka Y, Yamazaki Y, Ogihara Y, Tsunewaki K. Whole chloroplast genome comparison of rice, maize, and wheat: implications for chloroplast gene diversification and phylogeny of cereals. Mol Biol Evol. 2002;19(12):2084–2091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref060] 60.Ogihara Y, Terachi T, Sasakuma T. Intramolecular recombination of chloroplast genome mediated by short direct-repeat sequences in wheat species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85(22):8573–8577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref061] 61.Aldrich J, Cherney BW, Merlin E. The role of insertions/deletions in the evolution of the intergenic region between psbA and trnH in the chloroplast genome. Curr Genet. 1988;14(2):137–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref062] 62.Muller AE, Kamisugi Y, Gruneberg R, Niedenhof I, Horold RJ, Meyer P. Palindromic sequences and A+T-rich DNA elements promote illegitimate recombination in Nicotiana tabacum. J Mol Biol. 1999;291(1):29–46. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2957 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref063] 63.Goulding SE, Olmstead RG, Morden CW, Wolfe KH. Ebb and flow of the chloroplast inverted repeat. Mol Gen Genet. 1996;252(1–2):195–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref064] 64.Cai J, Liu X, Vanneste K, Proost S, Tsai WC, Liu KW, et al. The genome sequence of the orchid Phalaenopsis equestris. Nat Genet. 2015;47(1):65–72. doi: 10.1038/ng.3149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref065] 65.Fang Y, Wu H, Zhang T, Yang M, Yin Y, Pan L, et al. A complete sequence and transcriptomic analyses of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) mitochondrial genome. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37164 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037164 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref066] 66.Rodriguez-Moreno L, Gonzalez VM, Benjak A, Marti MC, Puigdomenech P, Aranda MA, et al. Determination of the melon chloroplast and mitochondrial genome sequences reveals that the largest reported mitochondrial genome in plants contains a significant amount of DNA having a nuclear origin. BMC Genomics. 2011;12(1):424 doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref067] 67.Alverson AJ, Wei X, Rice DW, Stern DB, Barry K, Palmer JD. Insights into the evolution of mitochondrial genome size from complete sequences of Citrullus lanatus and Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae). Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27(6):1436–1448. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref068] 68.Wang D, Wu YW, Shih AC, Wu CS, Wang YN, Chaw SM. Transfer of chloroplast genomic DNA to mitochondrial genome occurred at least 300 MYA. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24(9):2040–2048. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref069] 69.Yukawa T, Miyoshi K, Yokoyama J. Molecular phylogeny and character evolution of Cymbidium (Orchidaceae). Bull Nation Sci Mus, B (Tokyo). 2002;28(4):129–139. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref070] 70.Gustafsson AL, Verola CF, Antonelli A. Reassessing the temporal evolution of orchids with new fossils and a Bayesian relaxed clock, with implications for the diversification of the rare South American genus Hoffmannseggella (Orchidaceae: Epidendroideae). BMC Evol Biol. 2010;10:177 doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref071] 71.Park S, Grewe F, Zhu A, Ruhlman TA, Sabir J, Mower JP, et al. Dynamic evolution of Geranium mitochondrial genomes through multiple horizontal and intracellular gene transfers. New Phytol. 2015;208(2):570–583. doi: 10.1111/nph.13467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref072] 72.van den Berg C, Ryan A, Cribb PJ, Chase MW. Molecular phylogenetics of Cymbidium (Orchidaceae: Maxillarieae): Sequence data from internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA and plastid matK. Lindleyana. 2002;17(2):102–111. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref073] 73.Doyle JJ. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem bull. 1987;19:11–15. [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref074] 74.Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, et al. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(12):1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref075] 75.Leinonen R, Sugawara H, Shumway M, International Nucleotide Sequence Database C. The sequence read archive. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(Database issue):D19–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref076] 76.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215(3):403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref077] 77.Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(14):3059–3066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref078] 78.Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods. 2012;9(8):772 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref079] 79.Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Hohna S, et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 2012;61(3):539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pone.0187318.ref080] 80.Miller M, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T, editors. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 2010; 2010: IEEE.

PERMALINK

Independent degradation in genes of the plastid ndh gene family in species of the orchid genus Cymbidium (Orchidaceae; Epidendroideae)

Hyoung Tae Kim

Mark W Chase

Roles

Abstract

Introduction

Fig 1. Degradation patterns for 11 ndh genes in 743 angiosperm plastomes.

Results

Ten ndh loci among 23 Cymbidium species and three closely related taxa

Table 1. Taxa list for this study.

Different types of the ycf1-rpl32 region in Cymbidium

Fig 2. Four types of ycf1-rpl32 regions in organellar genomes of Cymbidum and closely related taxa.

Multiple copies of ndh genes in Orchidaceae

Table 2. The information of mt-ndh genes assembled from NGS data.

Two Cymbidium species in section Pachyrhizanthe

Fig 3. Alignment of ndh gene regions in both organellar genomes of Cymbidium.

Dendrobium catenatum

Fig 4. Alignment of ndh gene regions in Dendrobium catenatum and Epipogium aphyllum.

Epipogium aphyllum

Phylogenetic relationships between pt- and mt-ndh genes in Orchidaceae

Discussion

Patterns of ndh degradation in Cymbidium

Diverse ndhF genes result from gene conversion and indels

Intracellular gene transfers between organellar DNA

Unidirectional vs bidirectional IGT

Fig 5. Two hypotheses for multiple copies of ycf1-rpl32 region in Cymbidium species.

Materials and methods

DNA extraction, sequencing, annotation

Table 3. PCR amplified ndh genes among 23 Cymbidium species including hybrids and three closely related taxa.

Detecting ndh genes in chondriome

Fig 6. The process of NGS data assembly.

Phylogenetic analysis of ndh genes in both organellar genomes in Orchidaceae

Supporting information

Acknowledgments

Data Availability

Funding Statement

References

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases