Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 8;7(11):e016208. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016208

Table 3.

Risk factors possibly contributing to the choice of intervention in women undergoing hysterectomy or interventional radiology for obstetric haemorrhage, unadjusted and adjusted OR (95% CI) for hysterectomy (only) per risk factor

Risk factors Number of women Unadjusted OR (95% CI) for
hysterectomy only
Adjusted OR (95% CI) for hysterectomy only
Hysterectomy only, n=64 n, % Interventional radiology only, n=82 n, %
Demographic factors
 Maternal age ≥35 years 32 (50.0) 30 (36.5) 1.7 (0.8 to 3.3)
 Body mass index at booking ≥30 kg/m2 6 (9.3) 3 (3.6) 2.7 (0.6 to 11.3)
Obstetric factors
 Preterm (<37 weeks) 28 (43.8) 24 (29.3) 1.8 (0.9 to 3.7)
 Parity ≥3 18 (28.1) 7 (8.5) 2.7 (1.4 to 9.4)§ 7.2 (2.1 to 24.6)§
 Previous caesarean delivery¶ 31 (48.4) 18 (21.9) 3.3 (1.6 to 6.8)§ 2.3 (0.9 to 6.3)
 Caesarean delivery (≥22 weeks)*¶ 38/59 (64.4) 37/82 (45.1) 2.2 (1.1 to 4.3)§ 1.6 (0.6 to 4.0)
Cause of bleeding
 AIP and AIP+praevia¶ 16 (25.0) 9 (10.9) 2.7 (1.1 to 6.6)§ 3.0 (0.9 to 10.0)
 Atony 29 (45.3) 52 (63.4) 0.4 (0.2 to 0.9)§ 0.9 (0.3 to 2.3)
Organisational factors
 Weekend and/or non-office hours†¶ 24/60 (40.0) 34/80 (42.5) 0.9 (0.4 to 1.7)
 Interventional radiology NOT available‡ 30 (46.8) 15 (18.2) 3.9 (1.8 to 8.2)§ 8.2 (3.1 to 21.6)§

*Exclusion of 5 cases<22 weeks.

†Based on date and time of delivery.

‡Emergency interventional radiology service availability in the maternity unit where the woman gave birth.

§p<0.05.

¶Missing data: body mass index (n=27), previous caesarean delivery (n=1), delivery mode (n=1), placenta location (n=13), date of delivery (n=2), time of delivery (n=5), week/weekend (n=3).

AIP, abnormally invasive placenta.