Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 8;12(11):e0187543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187543

Table 2. Effect of nitrogen levels and ratios on culm breaking strength and culm lodging resistance index.

N level (kg ha -1) N ratio 2012–2013 2013–2014
Lodging score Culm breaking strength(Newtons) Culm lodging resistance index Lodging score Culm breaking strength(Newtons) Culm lodging resistance index
180 7:1:2:0 0 13.57abc α 25.81ab 18.06 13.84ab 26.00ab
5:1:2:2 1.67 16.36a 32.02a 7.5 15.52a 29.43a
3:1:3:3 0 16.74a 33.01a 3.33 15.49a 29.83a
225 7:1:2:0 32.22 12.10bc 23.24b 44.31 12.77ab 24.06ab
5:1:2:2 3.89 15.32abc 29.72ab 16.25 14.39ab 27.12ab
3:1:3:3 0 15.78ab 30.84ab 5.56 15.21a 28.91ab
270 7:1:2:0 71.11 11.81c 22.43b 57.78 11.19b 20.83b
5:1:2:2 0 12.99abc 25.28ab 44.31 12.60ab 23.48ab
3:1:3:3 0 13.15abc 25.63ab 41.25 13.16ab 24.40ab
F
Nitrogen levels(NL) 9.85** 8.46** 7.34** 8.84**
Nitrogen ratio(NR) 10.16** 10.40** 0.99 4.99*
NL×NR 0.69 0.56 1.96 0.07

α Values in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at P < 0.05 as determined by the LSD test. The test was conducted separately between the two years.

* F-test significant at 5% level.

** F-test significant at 1% level.