Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2017 Jun 7;39(4):657–668. doi: 10.1007/s10862-017-9606-x

Table 3.

Fit Statistics for the One-Factor, Oblique Two-Factor, Orthogonal Method Effects Two-Factor–with Positive Specific Factor, and Orthogonal Method Effects Two-Factor with Negative Specific Factor Configural Invariance Models of the LOT-R

Model S-Bχ2 df p CFIa SRMRb RMSEAb
One-Factor
 English 42.47 9 <.01 0.72 0.09 0.14
 Spanish 28.71 9 <.01 0.79 0.07 0.10
Oblique Two-Factor
 English 15.71 8 0.047 0.94 0.05 0.07
 Spanish 13.95 8 0.083 0.94 0.04 0.06
Orthogonal Method Effects Two-Factor – Positive Specific Factor
 English 4.69 6 0.585 1.00 0.02 0.00
 Spanish 12.00 6 0.062 0.94 0.04 0.07
Orthogonal Method Effects Two-Factor – Negative Specific Factor
 English 12.00 6 0.062 0.95 0.04 0.07
 Spanish 11.18 6 0.083 0.95 0.03 0.06

Note. S-B = Satorra-Bentler; CFI = robust comparative fit index; SRMR = standardized root mean square residual; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation.

a

Acceptable fit > .90, Good fit >.95.

b

Acceptable fit < .08, Good fit < .05.