Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Landsc Urban Plan. 2017 Jul 14;167:240–248. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.014

Table 3.

Agreement on crossing subscales between virtual raters with different familiarities of the environment (n=92)

Subscale Label Number
of Items
Mean
(SD)
Virtual Toola
In-field Toolb
ICC
(95%
Confidence
Interval)
Range of Item
Kappas or
ICCs (%
Agreement)
ICC Range of Item
Kappas or ICCs
(% Agreement)
Positive Subscale
Crosswalk Amenities/Qualities Crosswalk characteristics (e.g., marked crosswalk, high visibility markings) 9 0.81 0.577 0.304–0.660 0.807 −0.012–0.816
(1.01) (0.392–0.718) (77.1%–100%) (86.8%–99.7%)
Curb Pre- and post-crossing curb lining up with crossing 2 1.73 0.790 0.635–0.861 0.684 0.648–0.651
Quality/Presence (0.66) (0.680–0.865) (90.0%–94.0%) (81.8%–84.7%)
Intersection Control and Signage Stop signs, pedestrian walk signals 10 3.88 0.657 0.359–0.793 0.752 0.327–0.811
(2.85) (0.498–0.773) (72.9%–100%) (88.4%–98.7%)
Overall Positive Crossing Characteristics Subscale Sum of subscales: crosswalk amenities/qualities, curb quality/presence, intersection control and signage 3 3.24 0.703 0.828
subscales (1.96) (0.555–0.808)
Negative Subscale
Lanes/Road Width of Crossing Distance of crossing leg (# lanes wide, trichotomized) 1 1.16 0.348 0.553–0.517 0.525 0.524
(0.56) (0.126–0.537) (64.3%–68.6%) (66.0%–72.9%)
Crossing Impediments No curb ramp, gutters in crossing, faded/worn crosswalk markings 7 0.19 0.800 0.767–0.858 0.728 0.188–0.893
(0.49) (0.695–0.872) (94.3%–100%) (83.0%–99.4%)
Overall Negative Crossing Sum of subscales: Lanes/Road 2 0.88 0.548 0.587
Characteristics Subscale Width of Crossing, Crossing Impediments subscales (0.75) (0.357–0.695)
Overall Subscales
Overall Crossings Score Sum of subscales: Overall Positive 3.60 0.771 0.830
Crossing Characteristics-Overall Negative Crossing Characteristics (3.48) (0.650–0.854)
a

Measured by Google Earth between virtual raters with different familiarities of the environment.

b

Measured in field between raters with same familiarity of the environment (Millstain RA, Cain KL, Sallis JF, et al. Development, scoring, and reliability of the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS). BMC Public Health. 2013 Apr 27;13:403.).