Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 10.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Med. 2017 Jul 10;36(28):4570–4582. doi: 10.1002/sim.7387

Table 3.

Simulation results using regular logistic regression to analyze the data generated from the proposed model (top) and from a model with no effects of Markov chains on the outcome (bottom).

Covariate in the joint model Parameter and true value Estimate Bias SDa SEb Coverage probability
Logistic regression model fitted to the simulated data from scenario (i) (β ≠ 0, α ≠ 0, α2 ≠ 0, δ1 ≠ 0, δ2 ≠ 0)

Intercept β0 = -1.45 -1.21 0.24 0.37 0.37 0.88
x1 (continuous) β1 = 0.57 0.53 -0.04 0.09 0.10 0.93
x2 (binary, initial state) β2 = -0.26 -0.54 -0.28 0.40 0.41 0.91

Logistic regression model fitted to the simulated data from scenario (ii) (β ≠ 0, α = 0, α2 = 0, δ1 ≠ 0, δ2 ≠ 0)

Intercept β0= -1.45 -1.51 -0.06 0.37 0.38 0.96
x1 (continuous) β1= 0.57 0.59 0.02 0.10 0.10 0.96
x2 (binary, initial state) β2 = -0.26 -0.27 -0.01 0.41 0.42 0.96
a

Standard deviation of the point estimates.

b

Standard error, obtained from the squared root of the average of the estimated variance for each run.