Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Comput Biol Med. 2017 Oct 24;91:353–365. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.10.028

Table 4.

Percentage difference between PRM and UNST simulations of pressure drop, velocity, and vorticity and WSS magnitude for numerical analysis along polylines. Percentage differences are listed for peak systole, mid-diastole, and end-diastole of the cardiac cycle.

Pressure
% Difference
Velocity
% Difference
Vorticity
% Difference
WSS% Difference
Lines Peak systole Mid diastole End diastole Peak systole Mid diastole End diastole Peak systole Mid diastole End diastole Peak systole Mid diastole End diastole
I 1.85 0.61 1.15 0.49 2.00 2.55 −1.71 0.10 4.10 4.96 4.17 3.25
II 2.06 1.64 2.70 −2.46 −2.87 −1.39 −0.21 −0.25 −0.92 −4.74 −4.61 −3.60
III 2.14 1.81 2.07 −2.90 −2.21 −2.05 −2.69 −2.41 −2.44 −2.73 2.98 4.98
IV −2.28 0.93 1.25 2.13 −2.28 −0.50 2.21 −1.76 −3.06 −4.11 4.90 3.84

Mean 2.08 1.25 1.79 1.99 1.84 1.62 1.71 1.13 2.63 4.14 4.17 3.92

PRM: Parametric hexahedral mesh; UNST: Unstructured tetrahedral mesh; WSS: wall shear stress.