Table 2.

Mean and standard deviation of the quality measures Earth Mover's Distance (EMD), Distance Localization Error (DLE), Area Under receiver operating Curve (AUC), and F1-Score (F1), across 100 trials, at time points t1 = 0 ms, t2 = 280 ms, and t3 = 375 ms of Simulations 1, 2, 3, and 4, for both algorithms ENET-SSBL and ELASSO-SSBL.

		Simulation 1		Simulation 2		Simulation 3		Simulation 4
		ENET-SSBL	ELASSO-SSBL	ENET-SSBL	ELASSO-SSBL	ENET-SSBL	ELASSO-SSBL	ENET-SSBL	ELASSO-SSBL
EMD	t1	176 ± 50.1	170.6 ± 38	156 ± 58.1	105.3 ± 49.1	186.8 ± 46.5	192 ± 40.3	138.8 ± 54.2	90.9 ± 26.1
	t2	124.1 ± 42.7	125.2 ± 46.9	136.4 ± 69.2	110.7 ± 52.7	122.8 ± 55.1	124.5 ± 55.8	136.8 ± 73.9	111.6 ± 45.8
	t3	143.6 ± 55.9	142.2 ± 56.3	146.9 ± 68.6	118.6 ± 52	143.6 ± 55.8	149.3 ± 57.1	153.6 ± 82.2	117.7 ± 61
DLE	t1	1.77 ± 0.43	1.48 ± 0.42	2.78 ± 0.6	2.73 ± 0.71	2.06 ± 0.78	2.03 ± 0.86	2.81 ± 0.64	3.24 ± 0.59
	t2	3.03 ± 0.86	2.92 ± 0.93	3.77 ± 0.97	3.76 ± 1.09	3.45 ± 0.98	3.19 ± 0.89	4.2 ± 1.09	4.13 ± 1.09
	t3	2.09 ± 0.99	1.9 ± 1.12	3.21 ± 1.08	2.83 ± 1.34	2.57 ± 1.32	2.41 ± 1.32	3.96 ± 1.39	3.85 ± 1.69
AUC	t1	93.9 ± 1	94.1 ± 0.7	91 ± 1.4	91.4 ± 1.2	92.8 ± 1.4	93.1 ± 1.4	91.5 ± 1.1	91.4 ± 1.3
	t2	90.1 ± 2.9	90.2 ±3.5	86.6 ± 5.6	85.8 ± 5.9	88.6 ± 4.1	89 ± 3.5	85.9 ± 4.2	85.3 ± 4.9
	t3	93.7 ± 4.3	93.9 ± 3.9	90.2 ± 4.5	89.9 ± 6.1	93.6 ± 3.6	93.7 ± 4.3	90.7 ± 3.8	90.6 ± 5.4
F1	t1	61.5 ± 10.2	67.6 ± 7.3	35.2 ± 14.2	38.1 ± 14.1	60.7 ± 9.8	67.3 ± 6.5	37.3 ± 14	40.2 ± 12.3
	t2	37.8 ± 16.8	40 ± 19.4	28.3 ± 17.5	25.4 ± 18	37.5 ± 17.5	38.8 ± 20	26.2 ± 17.5	24.4 ± 18.5
	t3	50.7 ± 20.1	50.8 ± 25.1	34.1 ± 18	36.4 ± 19.5	54 ± 22.7	56.4 ± 23.8	35.6 ± 17	37.4 ± 17.6

Best results between ENET-SSBL and ELASSO-SSBL algorithms are highlighted in bold, while the best results among all simulations (along rows) are underlined.