Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 6;7(22):9333–9346. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3412

Table 4.

F‐ and p‐values from the ANCOVA analyses of the average total abundance, mean body mass, and average total biomass of the macroinvertebrate community at the start and end of the experiment, comparing only the benthic samples at the end (benthic), and comparing only the artificial plants with benthic samples within habitat treatment plots at the end (habitat)

Comparison Treatment Abundance Body mass Biomass
F‐value p‐Value F‐value p‐Value F‐value p‐Value
Start temp 0.043 .844 17.53 .009 40.07 .002
hc 0.013 .914 0.184 .686 0.638 .461
temp:hc 0.092 .774 0.929 .379 0.145 .719
End temp 3.322 .128 12.13 .018 61.99 <.001
hc 31.716 .002 4.179 .096 4.367 .091
temp:hc 0.750 .426 0.503 .510 1.076 .347
Benthic temp 2.387 .183 12.72 .016 70.30 <.001
hc 0.327 .592 0.087 .780 0.107 .757
temp:hc 9.770 .026 0.097 .768 1.931 .223
Habitat temp 1.705 .248 22.62 .005 24.37 .004
hc 2.550 .171 0.084 .784 0.274 .623
temp:hc 1.023 .358 1.025 .358 0.082 .786

Here, “temp” is the main effect of temperature, “hc” is the main effect of habitat complexity, and “temp:hc” is the interactive effect of the two.