Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 8;7(22):9391–9404. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3449

Table 6.

Comparisons between wRi, wSpc, and wSuz at the CI‐associated loci (type I, possible antidote, toxin), WD0631 and WD0632, from wMel, and the paralogous loci (type II), WRi_006710 and WRi_006720 from wRi. All reads from wSpc and wSuz are consistent with the differences shown

Location (gene, amino acid) wRi codon (codon, translation) wSpc codon (codon, translation) wSuz codon (codon, translation)
WD0631 a (antidote?)
363 AAA, Lys GAA, Glu GAA, Glu
473 AAA, Lys AGA, Arg AGA, Arg
WD0632 b (toxin?)
91 GGA, Gly GGG, Gly GGG, Gly
176 TAT, Tyr GAT, Asp GAT, Asp
213 TAT, Tyr TAC, Tyr TAC, Tyr
1,118 TTA, Leu TGA, STOP TTA, Leu
WRi_006710
663 TAT, Tyr CAT, His CAT, His
WRi_006720
1–108 Present Disrupted, see text Disrupted, see text
a

The duplicate orthologs in wRi are WRi_005370 and WRi_010030.

b

The duplicate orthologs in wRi are WRi_p005380 and WRi_p010040.