Table 2.
Discharge Destinations | Positive Predictive Value (%) | Negative Predictive Value (%) | Positive Likelihood Ratio (95% CI) | Negative Likelihood Ratio (95% CI) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
MRS 2–6 | MRS 3–6 | MRS 4–6 | MRS 2–6 | MRS 3–6 | MRS 4–6 | MRS 2–6 | MRS 3–6 | MRS 4–6 | MRS 2–6 | MRS 3–6 | MRS 4–6 | |
Unfavorable Outcome Defined by the MRS at 3mo | ||||||||||||
Home | 28 | 15 | 10 | 13 | 24 | 46 | 0.3 (0.2–0.3) | 0.2 (0.1–0.3) | 0.21 (0.1–0.3) | 4.5 (3.3–6.1) | 3.4 (2.7–4.2) | 2.3 (1.9–2.7) |
Relative’s/friend’s home | 48 | 43 | 19 | 39 | 51 | 66 | 0.6 (0.3–1.4) | 0.8 (0.3–1.9) | 0.47 (0.2–1.4) | 1.0 (0.9–1.1) | 1.0 (0.9–1.0) | 1.0 (0.9–1.0) |
Rehabilitation facility | 89 | 75 | 49 | 58 | 69 | 76 | 5.3 (3.5–7.9) | 3.2 (2.4–4.2) | 1.87 (1.5–2.3) | 0.5 (0.4–0.5) | 0.4 (0.4–0.5) | 0.6 (0.5–0.7) |
Nursing home | 95 | 92 | 84 | 45 | 57 | 73 | 13 (4.1–41) | 12 (4.8–29) | 10 (5.3–19) | 0.8 (0.7–0.8) | 0.8 (0.7–0.8) | 0.7 (0.7–0.8) |
Rehabilitation facility/nursing home discharge | 90 | 79 | 57 | 71 | 83 | 90 | 6.2 (4.3–8.9) | 4.0 (3.1–5.1) | 2.6 (2.2–3.0) | 0.3 (0.2–0.3) | 0.2 (0.2–0.3) | 0.2 (0.2–0.3) |
Unfavorable Outcome Defined by the MRS at 12mo | ||||||||||||
Home | 23 | 18 | 19 | 18 | 30 | 52 | 0.3 (0.2–0.3) | 0.2 (0.2–0.3) | 0.3 (0.2–0.4) | 3.3 (2.5–4.2) | 2.6 (2.2–3.2) | 1.9 (1.6–2.2) |
Relative’s/friend’s home | 53 | 42 | 32 | 41 | 53 | 67 | 0.8 (0.3–1.9) | 0.8 (0.3–2.0) | 0.9 (0.3–2.5) | 1.0 (0.9–1.0) | 1.0 (0.97–1.0) | 1.0 (0.9–1.0) |
Rehabilitation facility | 82 | 67 | 41 | 57 | 66 | 73 | 3.2 (2.3–4.4) | 2.3 (1.8–2.9) | 1.4 (1.2–1.8) | 0.5 (0.5–0.6) | 0.5 (0.5–0.7) | 0.7 (0.6–0.91) |
Nursing home | 93 | 88 | 78 | 46 | 58 | 73 | 9.7 (3.6–26) | 8.3 (3.8–18) | 7.2 (4.0–13) | 0.8 (0.8–0.8) | 0.8 (0.7–0.8) | 0.7 (0.6–0.8) |
Rehabilitation facility/nursing home discharge | 84 | 72 | 50 | 69 | 79 | 85 | 3.8 (2.9–5.1) | 2.9 (2.4–3.5) | 2.0 (1.7–2.3) | 0.3 (0.3–0.4) | 0.3 (0.2–0.4) | 0.4 (0.2–0.5) |