Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 28;99(6):479–484. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0072

Table 5.

Comparison of the various prognostic scoring systems

Scoring system Number of patients Deaths Logrank statistic G2/n PVE Rank
TNM
 I
 II
 III
 IV		 82
33
12
28
9		 7 (8.5%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
5 (17.8%)
2 (22.2%)		 1.021 0.012 1.19 5
AGES
 ≤3.99
 4–4.99
 5–5.99
 ≥6		 82
42
15
6
19		 7 (8.5%)
1 (2.4%)
0 (0%)
1 (16.6%)
5 (26.3%)		 11.090 1.499 77.66 2
MACIS
 <6
 6–6.99
 7–7.99
 ≥8		 82
40
12
6
24		 7 (8.5%)
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
1 (16.6%)
6 (25.0%)		 14.776 2.658 92.99 1
AMES
 Low risk
 High risk		 82
17
65		 7 (8.5%)
0 (0%)
7 (10.8%)		 2.002 0.048 4.76 4
EORTC
 <50
 50–65
 66–83
 84–108
 >108		 82
27
17
20
20
1		 7 (8.5%)
2 (8.3%)
0 (0%)
1 (5.0%)
3 (15.0%)
1 (100%)		 2.455 0.073 7.03 3

AGES = Age, Grade, Extent, Size; AMES = Age, Metastases, Extent, Sex; EORTC = European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer; TNM = Tumour, Nodes, Metastases; MACIS = Metastases, Age, Completeness of resection, Invasion, Size; PVE = proportion of variation in survival time explained