Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 21;16:470. doi: 10.1186/s12936-017-2095-2

Table 3.

Multivariate analysis of uptake of malaria prevention methods during pregnancy in Senegal

Variables IPTp uptake and ITN usage
Partial versus none Optimal versus none
RRR 95% CI (p value) RRR 95% CI (p value)
Age (years)
 < 20 (reference) 1.00
 20–34 1.22 0.8–1.8 (0.420) 1.36 0.93–1.99 (0.107)
 35–49 1.18 0.70–2.02 (0.663) 1.62 1.04–2.52 (0.043)
Place of residence
 Urban (ref) 1.00
 Rural 0.81 0.48–1.3 (0.214) 0.95 0.52–1.71 (0.093)
Wealth index quintile
 Poorest (ref) 1.00 1.00
 Poorer 1.27 0.9–1.8 (0.727) 1.72 1.13–2.60 (0.188)
 Middle 2.01 1.4–2.9 (0.145) 3.56 2.21–5.75 (0.003)
 Richer 1.19 0.60–2.2 (0.254) 1.93 0.94–3.98 (0.825)
 Richest 1.43 0.71–2.8 (0.526) 1.51 0.67–3.40 (0.957)
Number of ANC visits
 4+ 1.25 0.90–1.74 (0.076) 1.41 1.03–1.92 (0.049)
 1 1 1
Pregnancy intention
 Unintended (ref) 0.74 0.52–1.06 (0.076) 0.68 0.47–0.98 (0.040)
 Intended 1.00 1.00
Region
 Dakar (reference) 1.00 1.00
 Ziguinchor 0.42 0.20–0.90 (0.024) 2.21 0.85–5.80 (0.109)
 Diourbel 2.20 0.90–5.00 (0.059) 10.5 3.38–32.9 (0.001)
 Saint-Louis 1.26 0.71–2.15 (0.421) 5.30 2.20–13.1 (0.001)
 Tambacounda 0.41 0.19–0.70 (0.030 0.87 0.33–2.19 (0.784)
 Kaolack 0.64 0.28–1.27 (0.128) 1.40 0.60–3.80 (0.410)
 Thies 1.43 0.56–3.50 (0.460) 4.04 1.24–12.8 (0.018)
 Louga 1.33 0.61–2.87 (0.462) 6.00 2.27–16.0 (0.001)
 Fatick 1.08 0.53–2.20 (0.824) 7.90 2.82–22.0 (0.001)
 Kolda 0.42 0.21–0.83 (0.013) 1.50 0.57–3.84 (0.417)
 Matam 1.02 0.46–2.26 (0.947) 5.52 2.01–15.4 (0.001)
 Kaffrine 0.42 0.21–0.83 (0.013) 0.93 0.33–2.60 (0.895)
 Kedougou 0.41 0.18–0.92 (0.031) 1.40 0.46–4.24 (0.542)
 Sédhiou 0.61 0.31–1.20 (0.176) 2.47 0.95–6.40 (0.062)

Partial either received IPT or ITNs, Optimal combined uptake of ITNs and IPTp, None neither IPT nor ITNs, RRR relative risk ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval