Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 14;31(6):1700–1707. doi: 10.1111/jvim.14847

Table 2.

Hematologic information for anemic dogs compared to healthy control dogs

PCVa (%) TS (g/dL) Thrombocytopenia (N) (RI: 200‐500 K/μL)b Neutrophilia (N)a (RI: 3.0‐12.0 K/μL) Neutropenia (N) (RI: 3.0‐12.0 K/μL)
Control Dogs (N = 40) 47.70 ± 6.65 6.69 ± 0.49
Anemic Dogs
(N = 40)
22.78 ± 5.39 6.07 ± 1.30 N = 16
123 (84‐157)
N = 15
19.4 (12.5‐62.2)
N = 3
0.2 (0.0‐0.7)
Hemolytic
(N = 8)
19.88 ± 4.09 6.99 ± 1.15 N = 4
123 (122‐124)
N = 4
22.5 (13.1‐62.2)
Neoplastic (N = 9) 24.00 ± 5.48 5.52 ± 0.98 N = 5
120.5 (84‐157)
N = 4
16.1 (12.5‐20.9)
N = 1
0.2
Other
(N = 23)
23.42 ± 5.64 6.11 ± 1.42 N = 7
118 (93‐143)
N = 7
15.5 (12.9‐46.7)
N = 2
0.4 (0.0‐0.7)

PCV and TS values represent the mean and standard deviation.

If significant platelet clumping was noted on blood smear analysis, total platelet number was estimated as decreased, adequate, or increased.

a

Platelet and neutrophil values represent the median and range.

b

Platelet counts were not available for all anemic patients.