Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 21;4:170170. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2017.170

Table 6. Comparison of 2D/3D models with tissue slices.

· 2D/3D models · Tissue slices Tissue slices
ease of use
 level + to ++++ − to ++
 comment - from very simple (2D mono cultures) to relatively complicated (matrix-embedded co-cultures) - from technically complicated (tumor models) to difficult to access (patient samples)
  - growth may be followed in real-time - some parameters can be followed in real-time.
  - most components readily available - tumor material from patients can be difficult to access and variable
robustness
 level ++ to ++++ − to +++
 comment - more complex models are less robust - once parameters are established, mouse tumors are robustly sliced
  - important to quality check all components regularly - difficult to quality control human patient material, or reproduce results
complexity
 level − to ++ ++ to ++++
 comment - maximal complexity tested here included tumor cells, fibroblasts, and ECM components - tissue slices encompass the full complement of the local tumor-microenvironment
  - can be increased to include immune cell, vascular, or other tissue components - the function of individual compartments within the slice cultures over time require testing
applications
 examples - early drug discovery, target validation, resistance markers - mode-of- action studies of drug candidates, resistance markers
 comment - complexity of models can be stepwise adjusted to fit purpose - tumor heterogeneity may require a large number of tests
  - conclusions from test results limited to chosen complexity - slices from patient tumor samples represent closest possible link to clinic