Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 7;2017:1960517. doi: 10.1155/2017/1960517

Table 1.

Effects of QWRG in AIA model on paw swelling (x-±s, n = 10).

Groups Paw swelling (mL)
0 d 7 d 14 d 21 d 28 d 35 d
Control 0.03 ± 0.02 0.03 ± 0.12 0.09 ± 0.07 0.03 ± 0.11 0.04 ± 0.12 0.04 ± 0.16
AIA group 1.58 ± 0.41∗∗ 2.15 ± 0.40∗∗ 2.71 ± 0.66∗∗ 2.93 ± 0.77∗∗ 2.94 ± 0.73∗∗ 3.32 ± 1.26∗∗
DEX (5 mg/kg) 1.49 ± 0.20 0.53 ± 0.43## 0.64 ± 0.24## 0.86 ± 0.32## 0.78 ± 0.32## 0.90 ± 0.57##
QWRG
 1.0 g/kg 1.64 ± 0.52 1.68 ± 0.55#&& 2.25 ± 0.37#&& 2.31 ± 0.12#&& 2.37 ± 0.49#&& 2.44 ± 1.18#&&
 2.0 g/kg 1.64 ± 0.42 1.76 ± 0.48#&& 2.17 ± 0.49#&& 2.13 ± 0.28#&& 2.14 ± 0.88#&& 2.06 ± 0.13#&&
 4.0 g/kg 1.62 ± 0.71 1.12 ± 0.58##&& 1.53 ± 0.22##&& 1.29 ± 0.736##&& 1.20 ± 0.75##&& 1.26 ± 0.94##&&

The values from 10 different rats in each group. Data are mean ± SD. ∗∗P < 0.01 versus control; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 versus model; &&P < 0.01 versus DEX.