Table 4.

Effects of QWRG in AIA model on mechanical nociceptive threshold ($\stackrel{-}{x}\pm s$, n = 10).

Groups	Paw withdrawal latency (%)
	0 d	7 d	14 d	21 d	28 d	35 d
Control	100.0	99.2 ± 3.5	99.4 ± 5.5	98.7 ± 4.2	97.6 ± 3.4	99.1 ± 6.2
AIA group	100.0	35.4 ± 5.3∗∗	33.6 ± 7.6∗∗	32.4 ± 5.5∗∗	32.0 ± 6.2∗∗	30.1 ± 4.8∗∗
DEX (5 mg/kg)	100.0	44.4 ± 6.9#	52.7 ± 6.8##	63.5 ± 9.1##	65.8 ± 8.5##	72.3 ± 11.7##
QWRG
1.0 g/kg	100.0	35.4 ± 5.7	36.3 ± 9.6	37.4 ± 7.6	36.8 ± 6.8	37.1 ± 8.2
2.0 g/kg	100.0	37.7 ± 6.8	42.8 ± 7.8##&	52.9 ± 9.2##&	51.5 ± 6.9##&	53.6 ± 8.1##&
4.0 g/kg	100.0	41.4 ± 6.4#	45.5 ± 6.4##	58.8 ± 7.3##	60.2 ± 8.15##	60.1 ± 5.9##

The values from 10 different rats in each group. Data are mean ± SD. ^∗∗P < 0.01 versus control; ^#P < 0.05, ^##P < 0.01 versus model; ^&P < 0.05 versus DEX.