Skip to main content
. 2017;18(8):2299–2308. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.8.2299

Table 2.

Correlation between Clinicopathological Features, TGM2, TXNIP Expression, Ki Labeling Index of Our Patients

Characteristics All TGM2 p-value TXNIP p-value
Low High Low High
(N=50) (N=29) (N=21) (N=22) (N=28)
No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) No. (%)
Age (years)
Mean ± SD 42.34 ±11.59 40.34 ±10.70 45.09 ±12.46 0.155* 45.45 ±11.89 39.89 ±10.95 0.093*
Median (Range) 39.5 (24-65) 39 (24-65) 43 (24-65) 44 (24-65) 39 (24-65)
 < 40 years 26 (52%) 18 (69.20%) 8 (30.80%) 0.094 7 (26.90%) 19 (73.10%) 0.011
 > 40 years 24 (48%) 11 (45.80%) 13 (54.20%) 15 (62.50%) 9 (37.50%)
Sex
 Male 15 (30%) 5 (33.30%) 10 (66.70%) 0.021 12 (80%) 3 (20%) 0.001
 Female 35 (70%) 24 (68.60%) 11 (31.40%) 10 (28.60%) 25 (71.40%)
Site
 Parasagittal 14 (28%) 12 (85.70%) 2 (14.30%) 0.117 3 (21.40%) 11 (78.60%) 0.262
 Anterior Fossa 12 (24%) 7 (58.30%) 5 (41.70%) 5 (41.70%) 7 (58.30%)
 Convexity 8 (16%) 3 (37.50%) 5 (62.50%) 5 (62.50%) 3 (37.50%)
 Middle fossa 8 (16%) 4 (50%) 4 (50%) 4 (50%) 4 (50%)
 Posterior fossa 8 (16%) 3 (37.50%) 5 (62.50%) 5 (62.50%) 3 (37.50%)
Calcification
 Absent 28 (56%) 14 (50%) 14 (50%) 0.196 13 (46.40%) 15 (53.60%) 0.696
 Present 22 (44%) 15 (68.20%) 7 (31.80%) 9 (40.90%) 13 (59.10%)
Grade
 Grade I 31 (62%) 24 (77.40%) 7 (22.60%) 0.002§ 6 (19.40%) 25 (80.60%) <0.001§
 Grade II 12 (24%) 3 (25%) 9 (75%) 9 (75%) 3 (25%)
 Grade III 7 (14%) 2 (28.60%) 5 (71.40%) 7 (100%) 0 0%)
Ki67
 Low 30 (60%) 24 (80%) 6 (20%) <0.001 5 (16.70%) 25 (83.30%) <0.001
 High 20 (40%) 5 (25%) 15 (75%) 17 (85%) 3 (15%)
TGM2
 Low 29 (58%) 3 (10.30%) 26 (89.70%) <0.001
 High 21 (42%) 19 (90.50%) 2 (9.50%)
TXNIP
 Low 22 (44%) 3 (13.60%) 19 (86.40%) <0.001
 High 28 (56%) 26 (92.90%) 2 (7.10%)

Categorical variables were expressed as number (percentage), continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD & median (range)

*

Independent samples Student’s t-test

Chi-square test

§

Chi-square test for trend; p< 0.05 is significant.