Skip to main content
. 2017;18(8):2299–2308. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.8.2299

Table 3.

Correlation Between Clinicopathological Features, TGM2, TXNIP Expression, Ki Labeling Index, Disease Recurrence, Survival and Response to Therapy in Our Patients

Outcome All TGM2 p-value TXNIP p-value
Low High Low High
(N=50) (N=29) (N=21) (N=22) (N=28)
No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) No. (%) No. (%)
Surgery
 Gross tumor resection 27 (54%) 25 (86.20%) 2 (9.50%) <0.001 3 (13.60%) 24 (85.70%) <0.001
 Near total resection 11 (22%) 2 (6.90%) 9 (42.90%) 8 (36.40%) 3 (10.70%)
 Subtotal resection 7 (14%) 2 (6.90%) 5 (23.80%) 6 (27.30%) 1 (3.60%)
 Biopsy 5 (10%) 0 0%) 5 (23.80%) 5 (22.70%) 0 0%)
Simpson grading system
 Grade I 11 (22%) 11 (37.90%) 0 0%) <0.001 0 0%) 11 (39.30%) <0.001
 Grade II 16 (32%) 14 (48.30%) 2 (9.50%) 3 (13.60%) 13 (46.40%)
 Grade III 11 (22%) 2 (6.90%) 9 (42.90%) 8 (36.40%) 3 (10.70%)
 Grade IV 7 (14%) 2 (6.90%) 5 (23.80%) 6 (27.30%) 1 (3.60%)
 Grade V 5 (10%) 0 0%) 5 (23.80%) 5 (22.70%) 0 0%)
Residual
 Absent 27 (54%) 25 (86.20%) 2 (9.50%) <0.001 3 (13.60%) 24 (85.70%) <0.001
 Present 23 (46%) 4 (13.80%) 19 (90.50%) 19 (86.40%) 4 (14.30%)
Radiotherapy
 No 26 (52%) 24 (82.80%) 2 (9.50%) <0.001 2 (9.10%) 24 (85.70%) <0.001
 Yes 24 (48%) 5 (17.20%) 19 (90.50%) 20 (90.90%) 4 (14.30%)
Response (N=23) (N=4) (N=19) (N=19) (N=4)
 OAR 19 (82.60%) 2 (50%) 17 (89.50%) 0.125 15 (78.90%) 4 (100%) 1
 NR 4 (17.40%) 2 (50%) 2 (10.50%) 4 (21.10%) 0 0%)
 CR 17 (73.90%) 2 (50%) 15 (78.90%) 0.289 13 (68.40%) 4 (100%) 0.635
 PR 2 (8.70%) 0 0%) 2 (10.50%) 2 (10.50%) 0 0%)
 SD 2 (8.70%) 1 (25%) 1 (5.30%) 2 (10.50%) 0 0%)
 PD 2 (8.70%) 1 (25%) 1 (5.30%) 2 (10.50%) 0 0%)
Recurrence (N=45) (N=28) (N=17) (N=17) (N=28)
 Absent 32 (71.10%) 28 (100%) 4 (23.50%) <0.001 5 (29.40%) 27 (96.40%) <0.001
 Present 13 (28.90%) 0 0%) 13 (76.50%) 12 (70.60%) 1 (3.60%)
Survival (N=50) (N=29) (N=21) (N=22) (N=28)
 Absent 33 (66%) 29 (100%) 4 (19%) <0.001 6 (27.30%) 27 (96.40%) <0.001
 Present 17 (34%) 0 0%) 17 (81%) 16 (72.70%) 1 (3.60%)

Categorical variables were expressed as number (percentage), continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD & median (range)

Chi-square test; p< 0.05 is significant.