Table 1.
Studies on Collaborative Care Evaluating Clinical and Cost Outcomes.a
| Setting | Authors and Year | Country | Psychiatric Disorder | Study Details | Mean (SD) Age, y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary care clinics | IMPACT | United States | Depression | RCT, N = 1801, CC vs. UC | 71.2 (7.5) |
| PROSPECT | RCT, N=598, CC vs UC | >65 | |||
| PRISM-E | Depression, anxiety, alcohol use | RCT, N = 2022, CC vs. specialist referral | 73.5 (6.2) | ||
| Chew Graham et al., 20079 | United Kingdom | Depression | RCT, N = 105, CC vs. UC | 75.5 (7.5) | |
| Chaney et al., 201110 | United States | RCT, N = 546, CC vs. UC | 64.2 (12.2) | ||
| Abrams et al., 201511 | Depression, anxiety, alcohol | Prospective cohort, N = 1505 | 78.7 (9.8) | ||
| Callahan et al., 200612 | Dementia | RCT, N = 153, CC vs. UC | 77.5 (5.5) | ||
| Vickrey et al., 200613 Brown et al., 201314 | RCT, N = 408, CC vs. UC | 80.1 (6.6) | |||
| Home health care | Ell et al., 200715 | United States | Depression | RCT, N = 311, CC vs. UC | >65 |
| Knight and Houseman, 200816 | Quasi-experimental group design, N = 41 | >65 | |||
| Bruce et al., 201517 | Cluster RCT, N = 306, CC vs. UC | 76.5 (8) | |||
| Seniors residence | Llewellyn-Jones et al., 199918 | Australia | Depression | RCT, N = 220, CC vs. UC | 84.3 (5.8) |
| Waterreus et al., 199419 Blanchard et al., 199920 | United Kingdom | RCT, N = 96, CC vs. UC | 76 | ||
| Ciechownowski et al., 200421 | United States | RCT, N = 138, CC vs. UC | 73 (8.5) | ||
| Bartsch and Rodgers, 200922 | Prospective cohort, N = 138 | 74.1 | |||
| Telehealth | Oslin et al., 200323 | United States | Depression | RCT, N = 97, CC vs. UC | 61.9 (11) |
| Fortney et al., 200724 Pyne et al., 201025 | Prospective cohort, N = 395 | 60 (12.2) | |||
| Emery et al., 201226 | Prospective cohort, N = 150 | 71.7 (7.2) | |||
| Gellis et al., 201427 | RCT, N = 115, CC vs. UC | 79.3 (7.35) | |||
| Medical outpatient (OP) or inpatient setting (IP) | Kominski et al., 200128 | United States | Depression, anxiety, alcohol use | RCT, N = 1687, CC vs. UC | >60 |
| Cole et al., 200629 | Canada | Depression | RCT, N = 157, CC vs. UC | 78 (6.6) | |
| Williams et al., 200730 | United States | RCT, N = 188, CC vs. UC | 60 (12) | ||
| Rollman et al., 200931 | RCT, N = 302, CC vs. UC | 64 (11) | |||
| Bogner et al., 201032 | RCT, N = 58, CC vs. UC | 60.2 (7.4) | |||
| Huffman et al., 201133 Celano et al., 201634 | RCT, N = 175, CC vs. UC | 62.4 (12.5) | |||
| Walker et al., 201435 | United Kingdom | RCT, N = 142, CC vs. UC | 63.7 (8.8) |
aCC, collaborative care; IMPACT, Improving Mood—Promoting Access to Collaborative Treatment; PROSPECT, Prevention of Suicide in Primary Care in Elderly: Collaborative Trial; PRISM-E, Primary care Research In Substance abuse and Mental health for the Elderly; RCT, randomised controlled trial; UC, usual care.