Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 24.
Published in final edited form as: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2017 Feb 6;1048:10–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2017.02.007

Table 5.

Result of stability studies performed at low quality control (LQC) and high quality control (HQC) levels.

Auto-sampler
stability
(24 hours, 10°C)
Freeze-thaw
stability
(3 cycles)
Bench-top
(6 hour)
Short term
(1 week)

LQC HQC LQC HQC LQC HQC LQC HQC
Δ9-THC Mean 6.66 75.50 6.43 73.18 6.94 77.18 7.11 72.77
% Bias 6.61 0.67 2.93 −2.42 11.06 2.90 13.72 −2.97
% CV 2.44 0.55 2.53 3.91 4.78 1.85 - 3.74

CBD Mean 6.69 75.51 6.47 73.04 6.68 79.13 6.60 74.85
% Bias 7.04 0.68 3.48 −2.61 6.92 5.50 5.62 −0.19
% CV 1.18 1.93 1.22 1.72 2.32 1.85 4.82 3.26

11-OH Δ9-THC Mean 6.47 77.78 6.36 71.70 6.04 78.51 6.97 82.43
% Bias 3.47 3.70 1.69 −4.40 −3.34 4.69 11.54 9.91
% CV 3.65 2.51 1.24 1.28 2.62 2.10 1.06 1.94

Δ9-THC-COOH Mean 6.84 74.05 6.27 72.14 6.44 76.06 6.72 75.81
% Bias 9.41 −1.27 0.33 −3.81 2.96 1.42 7.50 1.08
% CV 5.42 2.56 2.95 1.11 0.91 1.14 0.99 6.13

%Bias calculated as 100×(mean-nominal)/nominal; CV calculated as 100×SD/mean; n=2 LQC-6.25 ng mL−1, HQC-75 ng mL−1