Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 30.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 11;166(10):707–714. doi: 10.7326/M16-1927

Appendix Table 8.

Sensitivity and Specificity in the Training Set, Stratified by AI or Non-AI Group (95% CIs)

Threshold Sensitivity (AI) Specificity (AI) Sensitivity (Non-AI) Specificity (Non-AI)
1 126/126 = 100.0% (96.3%–100.0%) 5/89 = 5.6% (2.1%–13.2%) 60/63 = 95.2% (85.8%–98.8%) 24/84 = 28.6% (19.5%–39.6%)
2 113/126 = 89.7% (82.7%–94.2%) 24/89 = 27.0% (18.4%–37.6%) 47/63 = 74.6% (61.8%–84.4%) 53/84 = 63.1% (51.8%–73.2%)
3 93/126 = 73.8% (65.1%–81.0%) 54/89 = 60.7% (49.7%–70.7%) 39/63 = 61.9% (48.8%–73.6%) 71/84 = 84.5% (74.6%–91.2%)
4 86/126 = 68.3% (59.3%–76.1%) 60/89 = 67.4% (56.6%–76.8%) 36/63 = 57.1% (44.1%–69.3%) 74/84 = 88.1% (78.8%–93.8%)
5 75/126 = 59.5% (50.4%–68.1%) 61/89 = 68.5% (57.7%–77.7%) 34/63 = 54.0% (41.0%–66.4%) 79/84 = 94.0% (86.0%–97.8%)
6 46/126 = 36.5% (28.3%–45.6%) 80/89 = 89.9% (81.2%–95.0%) 28/63 = 44.4% (32.1%–57.4%) 82/84 = 97.6% (90.9%–99.6%)
7 22/126 = 17.5% (11.5%–25.5%) 84/89 = 94.4% (86.8%–97.9%) 13/63 = 20.6% (11.9%–33.0%) 83/84 = 98.8% (92.6%–99.9%)
8 10/126 = 7.9% (4.1%–14.5%) 87/89 = 97.8% (91.4%–99.6%) 9/63 = 14.3% (7.1%–25.9%) 84/84 = 100.0% (94.6%–100.0%)
9 8/126 = 6.3% (3.0%–12.5%) 89/89 = 100.0% (94.8%–100.0%) 7/63 = 11.1% (5.0%–22.2%) 84/84 = 100.0% (94.6%–100.0%)
10 5/126 = 4.0% (1.5%–9.5%) 89/89 = 100.0% (94.8%–100.0%) 5/63 = 7.9% (3.0%–18.3%) 84/84 = 100.0% (94.6%–100.0%)

AI = assault-injured.