Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 26;66(12):3130–3141. doi: 10.2337/db17-0398

Table 3.

MR estimate of the association between lipids and any DR using SNPs unique to each lipid fraction and independent of glycemic traits# (primary analysis)

All ethnicities
(N = 2,969 case and 4,096 control subjects)
Caucasian
(N = 797 case and 1,208 control subjects)
Chinese
(N = 273 case and 826 control subjects)
No. of SNPs* OR (95% CI) P value I2, % No. of SNPs* OR (95% CI) P value I2, % No. of SNPs* OR (95% CI) P value I2, %
HDL
44
0.91 (0.67–1.23)
0.539
0.0
44
0.99 (0.61–1.60)
0.960
8.3
21
1.36 (0.29–6.44)
0.699
0.0
LDL
9
2.50 (0.91–6.87)
0.075
0.0
9
3.93 (0.53–29.33)
0.182
0.0
3
0.70 (0.01–88.38)
0.885
0.0
Triglycerides
15
1.00 (0.86–1.15)
0.983
0.0
15
1.05 (0.67–1.65)
0.828
0.0
4
1.09 (0.05–25.66)
0.959
5.1
Total cholesterol 18 0.83 (0.53–1.31) 0.424 0.0 18 0.74 (0.42–1.30) 0.293 0.0

β(SNP-lipid) estimates taken from the GLGC for Caucasians and the AGEN Consortium for Chinese differed. Therefore, we performed analyses in these two populations separately.

*Number of SNPs included in meta-analysis.

†ORs are for a SD of genetically induced increases in plasma lipid profiles.

#Two SNPs that showed genome-wide significant association with glycemic traits were also excluded: rs9686661and rs12328675.