Table 3B.
Clinical Activity of Patients Who Received the Sequenced Regimen of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab*
Cohort | Dose | Response-Evaluable Patients † n | CR n |
PR n |
uPR‡ n |
irPR§ n |
SD ≥24 wk n |
irSD§ ≥24 wk n |
Objective Response Rate¶ % [95% CI] |
AggregateClinical Activity Rate║ % [95% CI] |
≥80% Tumor Reduction at 8 wk n (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 | 1 mg/kg nivolumab + prior ipilimumab | 16 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 (6) | 0 | 38 [15-65] | 69 [41-89] | 4 (25) |
7 | 3 mg/kg nivolumab + prior ipilimumab | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 [2-43] | 0 |
All | Sequenced treatment | 30 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 (3) | 0 | 20 [8-39] | 43 [26-63] | 4 (13) |
CR denotes complete response, PR partial response, uPR unconfirmed partial response, irPR immune-related partial response, SD stable disease, irSD immune-related stable disease.
Response-evaluable patients were those who received at least one dose of study therapy, had measurable disease at baseline, and one of the following: 1) at least one on-treatment tumor evaluation, 2) clinical progression, or 3) death prior to the first on-treatment tumor evaluation.
Patients who had a PR after one tumor assessment but did not have sufficient follow-up time for confirmation of the initial PR.
Patients who had target tumor-lesion reduction in the presence of new lesions, consistent with immune-related PR or SD.11
[(CR + PR) / no. response-evaluable patients] × 100. Confidence intervals were estimated by the Clopper-Pearson method.
[(CR + PR + uCR + uPR + irPR + SD ≥24 wk + irSD ≥24 wk) / no. response-evaluable patients] × 100.