Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 21;5(12):E1189–E1196. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-120831

Table 3. Clinical outcomes of bi-flanged metal stents versus lumen-apposing metal stents.

BFMS LAMS P value 1
Patients, n 40 32
Number of necrosectomy procedures, median (95 %CI)  2.0 (2.0 – 3.7)  1.0 (0 – 2.0) 0.005
Hospital stay post-EUS, median (95 %CI), days 28 (17 – 45) 25 (13 – 45) 0.83
Time between stent insertion and removal, median (95 %CI), weeks  7.8 (5.4 – 14.0)  9.0 (6.0 – 13.6) 0.52
Time between stent insertion and attempted retrieval, 2 median (95 %CI), weeks 12.2 (4.1 – 43.3) 10.4 (2.5 – 26.3) 0.75
Stents, n 44 33
30-day adverse events. n
  • Stent misplacement

 2  1  > 0.99
  • Stent deployment failure

 2  0 0.50
  • Additional percutaneous drain

 3  4 0.45
  • Dislodged stent during necrosectomy

 5  3  > 0.99
  • Clinically significant stent migration

 2  0 0.50
Composite end point, n (%) 14 (31.8)  8 (24.2) 0.61

BFMS, bi-flanged metal stent; LAMS, lumen-apposing metal stent; EUS, endoscopic ultrasound; CI, confidence interval.

1

All Student’s t test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous values or Fisher’s exact/chi-squared test for categorical values

2

Stent found to have migrated at the time of endoscopy.