Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Dec;42(12):2843–2854. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1206-4

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Boxplots summarizing ROI sizes for 2D and 3D MRE under different conditions. For each MRE method, the boxplots are grouped by driver type (different columns) and then by breath-hold phase (different shading). ROI sizes between methods are not comparable due to differences in the numbers of acquired slices (4 for 2D MRE, 28–32 for 3D MRE).