Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Dec;42(12):2843–2854. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1206-4

Table 3.

Reproducibility of 2D and 3D MRE stiffness values measured under different breath-hold phases, keeping driver type constant

Conditions Reproducibility parameter


MRE
method
Breath-hold
phase
(Variable
condition)
Driver
type
(Constant
condition)
Bias
(kPa)*
Bias
p-
value
RDC LOA
(kPa)
CCC
2D Exp – Ins Rigid − 0.08 0.14 0.44 −0.52, 0.36 0.72 (0.38, 0.89)
2D Exp – Ins Flexible − 0.07 0.28 0.54 −0.62, 0.47 0.71 (0.36, 0.88)
3D Exp – Ins Rigid − 0.19 <0.01 0.31 −0.50, 0.13 0.61 (0.26, 0.81)
3D Exp – Ins Flexible − 0.13 <0.01 0.30 −0.42, 0.17 0.73 (0.41, 0.89)

Table summarizes the reproducibility parameters for 2D and 3D MRE measured under different breath-hold phases, keeping driver type constant.

*

The bias is calculated as the mean value in expiration minus the mean value in inspiration. Hence, a negative bias indicates that liver stiffness values measured in expiration were less than those measured in inspiration.

Ins=inspiration;. Exp=expiration;. RDC=reproducibility coefficients; LOA=Limit of Agreement; CCC=concordance correlation coefficients.

Values in parentheses are 95% confidence limits.