Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017 Dec;42(12):2843–2854. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1206-4

Table 4.

Reproducibility of 2D and 3D MRE stiffness values measured with different driver types, keeping breath-hold phase constant

Conditions Reproducibility parameter


MRE
method
Breath-hold
phase
(Constant
condition)
Driver
type
(Variable
condition)
Bias
(kPa)*
Bias
p-
value
RDC LOA
(kPa)
CCC
2D Inspiration Rigid – Flexible 0.07 0.22 0.44 −0.37, 0.50 0.79 (0.50, 0.92)
2D Expiration Rigid – Flexible 0.06 0.20 0.37 −0.31, 0.43 0.83 (0.58, 0.94)
3D Inspiration Rigid – Flexible 0.03 0.19 0.20 −0.17, 0.23 0.94 (0.82, 0.98)
3D Expiration Rigid – Flexible −0.03 0.20 0.19 −0.22, 0.16 0.86 (0.65, 0.95)

Table summarizes the reproducibility parameters for 2D and 3D MRE measured with different drivers, keeping breath-hold phase constant.

*

The bias is calculated as the mean stiffness value with the rigid driver minus the mean value with the flexible driver. Hence, a positive bias indicates that liver stiffness values measured with the rigid driver were greater than those measured with the flexible driver.

RDC=reproducibility coefficients; LOA=Limit of Agreement; CCC=concordance correlation coefficients.

Values in parentheses are 95% confidence limits.